public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-96983-4-5AZaapJInr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-96983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> This may lead to a total mess, and I am unable to test it, but can you try:
I just ran bootstraps on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and
i386-pc-solaris2.11. x86 results are unchanged, but sparc is completely
miserable:
=== gfortran Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes 18878
# of unexpected failures 16537
# of expected failures 177
# of untested testcases 1752
# of unresolved testcases 14688
# of unsupported tests 706
likewise with -m64.
Most (all?) tests fail to link now, failing to find one or more of
cabsq
copysignq
fmodq
roundq
sqrtq
truncq
e.g.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 (test for
excess errors)
Excess errors:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
cabsq
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so
fmodq
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so
sqrtq
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so
roundq
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so
truncq
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so
copysignq
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so
ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 13:21 [Bug fortran/96983] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-08 14:18 ` [Bug fortran/96983] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-08 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-08 15:50 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-08 19:08 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-08 19:54 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-08 20:52 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-09 9:48 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-09 14:51 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-09 14:54 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-09 15:01 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2020-09-09 17:58 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-09 19:03 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 12:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2020-09-10 17:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 22:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message]
2020-09-10 22:59 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 23:12 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 23:28 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-10 23:31 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-11 18:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-11 19:47 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-13 21:37 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2020-09-14 17:06 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2020-09-14 19:04 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-14 20:04 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-14 20:42 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2020-09-15 0:08 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-03 15:15 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2020-10-03 18:57 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2020-10-16 12:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-30 21:58 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 16:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 11:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 3:03 ` [Bug fortran/96983] [11/12 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-19 12:37 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-19 16:43 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-05-20 7:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-20 8:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-20 8:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28 7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 2:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-17 21:00 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-96983-4-5AZaapJInr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).