public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148
@ 2020-09-15  7:42 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-15 12:48 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-15  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056

            Bug ID: 97056
           Summary: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on
                    aarch64_be since r11-3148
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Since r11-3148 (g:8d3767c30240c901a493d82d9d20f306b2f0152d), I've noticed that:
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve 
scan-assembler-times \\tstr\\tq 1
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve : \\tstr\\tq found 0
times

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/97056] [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148
  2020-09-15  7:42 [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-15 12:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-15 12:55 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-15 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.0
            Version|10.0                        |11.0

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Did it pass at g:484af18ee1c63eb8d212563e40aa765da5be7f82 thus before the
g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168 change?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/97056] [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148
  2020-09-15  7:42 [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-15 12:48 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-15 12:55 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-15 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-15 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056

--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon <clyon at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, it was failing at that time.

It started passing between r11-3093 and r11-3103, and fails again since
r11-3148.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/97056] [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148
  2020-09-15  7:42 [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-15 12:48 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-09-15 12:55 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-09-15 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-10-16 12:08 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-10  6:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-15 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK, in between the revs the cost modeling was disabled so that would explain
it, we just got back to the previous state then.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/97056] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148
  2020-09-15  7:42 [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-09-15 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-16 12:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-10  6:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-16 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|11.0                        |---
            Summary|[11 regression]             |aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c
                   |aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c  |fails on aarch64_be since
                   |fails on aarch64_be since   |r11-3148
                   |r11-3148                    |

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unclear regression status.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/97056] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148
  2020-09-15  7:42 [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-10-16 12:08 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-10  6:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-10  6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97056

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-10
           Keywords|                            |testsuite-fail
             Target|aarch64                     |aarch64_be
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed with GCC 12.2.0 on aarch64_be-linux-gnu.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-10  6:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-15  7:42 [Bug target/97056] New: [11 regression] aarch64/sve/cost_model_2.c fails on aarch64_be since r11-3148 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-15 12:48 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-15 12:55 ` clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-15 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-16 12:08 ` [Bug target/97056] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-10  6:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).