public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/97375] New: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto)
@ 2020-10-12 3:37 anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2020-10-12 7:42 ` [Bug c++/97375] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com @ 2020-10-12 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Bug ID: 97375
Summary: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring
non-type template paramter with decltype(auto)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Consider the following program:
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template<const int N>
void f1()
{
std::cout << std::is_const_v<decltype(N)> << std::endl;
}
template<decltype(auto) N>
void f2()
{
std::cout << std::is_const_v<decltype(N)> << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
const int i = 0;
f1<i>();
f2<i>();
}
When compiling it with -std=c++17 -pedantic-errors it gives the following
output:
0
1
I expect it to give the following output instead:
0
0
So that the ignoral of top-level const is done in both cases.
Note that clang gives the correct output. Compiler explorer link showing the
difference between clang and gcc behaviour:
https://godbolt.org/z/aefYKd
I tried to report this bug first to clang (with a different example program),
but it turned out from the discussion (comment #3) that the bug was actually in
gcc:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47792#c3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97375] Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto)
2020-10-12 3:37 [Bug c++/97375] New: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto) anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
@ 2020-10-12 7:42 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-14 7:35 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2021-06-09 14:20 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-12 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2020-10-12
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97375] Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto)
2020-10-12 3:37 [Bug c++/97375] New: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto) anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2020-10-12 7:42 ` [Bug c++/97375] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-14 7:35 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2021-06-09 14:20 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com @ 2020-10-14 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
--- Comment #1 from Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com> ---
Here is another example of the same problem without using decltype(auto), so
the problem seems to be more general:
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
template<const int I>
void f1()
{
std::cout << std::is_const_v<decltype(I)> << std::endl;
}
template<typename T, T I>
void f2()
{
std::cout << std::is_const_v<decltype(I)> << std::endl;
}
int main()
{
f1<0>(); // Outputs: 0 Ok
f2<const int, 0>(); // Outputs: 1 Not ok. Should output 0 also.
}
Compiler explorer link for this example: https://godbolt.org/z/8ah1ax
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97375] Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto)
2020-10-12 3:37 [Bug c++/97375] New: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto) anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2020-10-12 7:42 ` [Bug c++/97375] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-14 7:35 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
@ 2021-06-09 14:20 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-09 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk by r12-1224. Maybe we want to backport that to 11 too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-09 14:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-12 3:37 [Bug c++/97375] New: Unexpected top-level const retainment when declaring non-type template paramter with decltype(auto) anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2020-10-12 7:42 ` [Bug c++/97375] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-14 7:35 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2021-06-09 14:20 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).