public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if'
@ 2020-10-14 13:51 tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
2020-10-14 13:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn @ 2020-10-14 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Bug ID: 97420
Summary: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
Target Milestone: ---
Hi, the following code maybe valid, since 'std::find_if' is allowed since
c++17.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/find
$ cat s.cpp
# include <cctype>
# include <algorithm>
template<int (& F)(int)>
constexpr int A(unsigned char a) noexcept(noexcept(F(a)))
{ return F(a); }
int main()
{
const char t[] = "a";
std::find_if(t, t + 1, A<std::isspace>);
}
$ g++ -c -std=c++2a s.cpp
s.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
s.cpp:12:43: error: no matching function for call to ‘find_if(const char [2],
const char*, <unresolved overloaded function type>)’
12 | std::find_if(t, t + 1, A<std::isspace>);
|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] error: no matching function for call to 'find_if'
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
@ 2020-10-14 13:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-14 14:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-14 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
std::find_if has existed since C++98.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] error: no matching function for call to 'find_if'
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
2020-10-14 13:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-14 14:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 1:51 ` [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-14 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2020-10-14
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced:
int isspace (int) noexcept;
template<int (& F)(int)> void A() { }
auto p = A<isspace>;
The problem is that the NTTP reference cannot bind to a noexcept function.
It works with a reference to a noexcept function:
template<int (& F)(int) noexcept> void A() { }
It only fails for C++17 and later because the noexcept isn't part of the type
before that.
I think we can consider this a regression, since the same code compiles in
C++14 and with previous versions of GCC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
2020-10-14 13:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-14 14:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-27 1:51 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-27 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |10.3.0, 11.0, 8.4.0, 9.3.0
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work| |7.5.0
Summary|NTTP function reference |[8/9/10/11/12 Regression]
|cannot bind to noexcept |NTTP function reference
|function |cannot bind to noexcept
| |function
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We started to reject the testcase in comment #2 (with -std=c++17) after
r8-1259.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-27 1:51 ` [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-30 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-30 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-30 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-07 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 100472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-07 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-26 13:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-26 13:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-26 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4329e3dd6fb7c78948fcf9d2f5b9d873deec284
commit r12-1067-gb4329e3dd6fb7c78948fcf9d2f5b9d873deec284
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Wed May 26 08:35:31 2021 -0400
c++: Fix reference NTTP binding to noexcept fn [PR97420]
Here, in C++17 mode, convert_nontype_argument_function is rejecting
binding a non-noexcept function reference template parameter to a
noexcept function (encoded as the template argument '*(int (&) (int)) &f').
The first roadblock to making this work is that the argument is wrapped
an an implicit INDIRECT_REF, so we need to unwrap it before calling
strip_fnptr_conv.
The second roadblock is that the NOP_EXPR cast converts from a function
pointer type to a reference type while simultaneously removing the
noexcept qualification, and fnptr_conv_p doesn't consider this cast to
be a function pointer conversion. This patch fixes this by making
fnptr_conv_p treat REFERENCE_TYPEs and POINTER_TYPEs interchangeably.
Finally, in passing, this patch also simplifies noexcept_conv_p by
removing a bunch of redundant checks already performed by its only
caller fnptr_conv_p.
PR c++/97420
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cvt.c (noexcept_conv_p): Remove redundant checks and simplify.
(fnptr_conv_p): Don't call non_reference. Use INDIRECT_TYPE_P
instead of TYPE_PTR_P.
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument_function): Look through
implicit INDIRECT_REFs before calling strip_fnptr_conv.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept68.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-26 13:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-13 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-13 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-13 14:03 ` [Bug c++/97420] [9/10 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-13 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbad9d7cfdb8dd8e28589160120546a61adeeedf
commit r11-8726-gbbad9d7cfdb8dd8e28589160120546a61adeeedf
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Wed May 26 08:35:31 2021 -0400
c++: Fix reference NTTP binding to noexcept fn [PR97420]
Here, in C++17 mode, convert_nontype_argument_function is rejecting
binding a non-noexcept function reference template parameter to a
noexcept function (encoded as the template argument '*(int (&) (int)) &f').
The first roadblock to making this work is that the argument is wrapped
an an implicit INDIRECT_REF, so we need to unwrap it before calling
strip_fnptr_conv.
The second roadblock is that the NOP_EXPR cast converts from a function
pointer type to a reference type while simultaneously removing the
noexcept qualification, and fnptr_conv_p doesn't consider this cast to
be a function pointer conversion. This patch fixes this by making
fnptr_conv_p treat REFERENCE_TYPEs and POINTER_TYPEs interchangeably.
Finally, in passing, this patch also simplifies noexcept_conv_p by
removing a bunch of redundant checks already performed by its only
caller fnptr_conv_p.
PR c++/97420
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cvt.c (noexcept_conv_p): Remove redundant checks and simplify.
(fnptr_conv_p): Don't call non_reference. Use INDIRECT_TYPE_P
instead of TYPE_PTR_P.
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument_function): Look through
implicit INDIRECT_REFs before calling strip_fnptr_conv.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept68.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit b4329e3dd6fb7c78948fcf9d2f5b9d873deec284)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [9/10 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-13 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-13 14:03 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:43 ` [Bug c++/97420] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-13 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10 Regression] NTTP
|NTTP function reference |function reference cannot
|cannot bind to noexcept |bind to noexcept function
|function |
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 11.2/12 so far
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [10 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-13 14:03 ` [Bug c++/97420] [9/10 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [10 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:43 ` [Bug c++/97420] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 4:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [10 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-06-30 4:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-30 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad42219766d0e67bede2c9bd94c98082cde42518
commit r10-11482-gad42219766d0e67bede2c9bd94c98082cde42518
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Wed May 26 08:35:31 2021 -0400
c++: Fix reference NTTP binding to noexcept fn [PR97420]
Here, in C++17 mode, convert_nontype_argument_function is rejecting
binding a non-noexcept function reference template parameter to a
noexcept function (encoded as the template argument '*(int (&) (int)) &f').
The first roadblock to making this work is that the argument is wrapped
an an implicit INDIRECT_REF, so we need to unwrap it before calling
strip_fnptr_conv.
The second roadblock is that the NOP_EXPR cast converts from a function
pointer type to a reference type while simultaneously removing the
noexcept qualification, and fnptr_conv_p doesn't consider this cast to
be a function pointer conversion. This patch fixes this by making
fnptr_conv_p treat REFERENCE_TYPEs and POINTER_TYPEs interchangeably.
Finally, in passing, this patch also simplifies noexcept_conv_p by
removing a bunch of redundant checks already performed by its only
caller fnptr_conv_p.
PR c++/97420
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cvt.c (noexcept_conv_p): Remove redundant checks and simplify.
(fnptr_conv_p): Don't call non_reference. Use INDIRECT_TYPE_P
instead of TYPE_PTR_P.
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument_function): Look through
implicit INDIRECT_REFs before calling strip_fnptr_conv.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept68.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit b4329e3dd6fb7c78948fcf9d2f5b9d873deec284)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97420] [10 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2023-06-30 4:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97420
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |10.4.0, 11.1.0
Known to work| |10.5.0, 11.2.0
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-14 13:51 [Bug c++/97420] New: error: no matching function for call to 'find_if' tangyixuan at mail dot dlut.edu.cn
2020-10-14 13:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-14 14:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 1:51 ` [Bug c++/97420] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] NTTP function reference cannot bind to noexcept function ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 8:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-07 12:58 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:54 ` [Bug c++/97420] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-26 13:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-13 14:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-13 14:03 ` [Bug c++/97420] [9/10 " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:43 ` [Bug c++/97420] [10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 4:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).