public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
@ 2020-10-20 15:21 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 15:29 ` [Bug ada/97504] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (49 more replies)
0 siblings, 50 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-20 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Bug ID: 97504
Summary: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:1e70b1a358b6ce3b894f284d88fbb90518d45cc0, r11-4029
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/./gcc/
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/
-isystem
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/include
-isystem
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
-c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc a-nallfl.ads -o a-nallfl.o
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: profile of "Sin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: profile of "Cos" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: profile of "Tan" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: profile of "Exp" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: profile of "Sqrt" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: profile of "Log" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: profile of "Acos" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: profile of "Asin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: profile of "Atan" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: profile of "Sinh" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: profile of "Cosh" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: profile of "Tanh" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: profile of "Pow" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
../gcc-interface/Makefile:302: recipe for target 'a-nallfl.o' failed
make[7]: *** [a-nallfl.o] Error 1
commit 1e70b1a358b6ce3b894f284d88fbb90518d45cc0 (HEAD)
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date: Sun Oct 18 17:19:53 2020 -0300
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-20 15:29 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-10-21 6:07 ` [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (48 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2020-10-20 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556477.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 15:29 ` [Bug ada/97504] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2020-10-21 6:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-21 8:48 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
` (47 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-21 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords| |build
Summary|[11 regress] Ada bootstrap |[11 Regression] Ada
|error after r11-4029 |bootstrap error after
| |r11-4029
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 15:29 ` [Bug ada/97504] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-10-21 6:07 ` [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-21 8:48 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
2020-10-22 18:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (46 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: stefansf at linux dot ibm.com @ 2020-10-21 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> ---
For the sake of completeness, this also fails on S/390.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-21 8:48 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
@ 2020-10-22 18:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 6:14 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (45 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-22 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2020-10-22
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This occurs on Aarch64 and SPARC as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-22 18:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-23 6:14 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 6:21 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (44 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-23 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-23 6:14 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-23 6:21 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 9:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (43 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-23 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49427
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49427&action=edit
patch that should fix the remaining s390 problem
So, the issue is already fixed on aarch64-*, powerpc*-*, and
sparc*-sun-solaris*.
Stefan, could you possibly confirm that this patch fixes it on s390?
I've put in the fix for sparc*-linux-gnu as well, for good measure.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-23 6:21 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-23 9:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 9:43 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (42 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-23 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e3b9ddb996f18d541a3e03611d46c3a6c0c0b5f
commit r11-4314-g9e3b9ddb996f18d541a3e03611d46c3a6c0c0b5f
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date: Fri Oct 23 06:37:07 2020 -0300
more wraplf for aux long long float: s390, sparc and powerpc
The wraplf version of Ada.Numerics.Aux_Long_Long_Float is needed on
s390* as well. Also add it to sparc*-linux-gnu and powerpc-darwin,
that were missed when adding it for sparc and ppc targets.
for gcc/ada/ChangeLog
PR ada/97504
* Makefile.rtl (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS): Select wraplf version
of Aux_Long_Long_Float for s390 and remaining sparc and
powerpc targets.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-23 9:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-23 9:43 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 9:50 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
` (41 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-23 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-23 9:43 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-23 9:50 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
2020-10-24 14:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
` (40 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: stefansf at linux dot ibm.com @ 2020-10-23 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #5)
> Created attachment 49427 [details]
> patch that should fix the remaining s390 problem
>
> So, the issue is already fixed on aarch64-*, powerpc*-*, and
> sparc*-sun-solaris*.
>
> Stefan, could you possibly confirm that this patch fixes it on s390?
Build is successful on s390. Testsuite still running.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-23 9:50 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
@ 2020-10-24 14:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-10-24 14:56 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (39 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2020-10-24 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
Still broken.
/daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20201024/Build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/daten/riscv64/gcc/gcc-20201024/Build/./gcc/ -B/usr/riscv64-suse-linux/bin/
-B/usr/riscv64-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/riscv64-suse-linux/include
-isystem /usr/riscv64-suse-linux/sys-include -c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall
-gnatpg -nostdinc a-nallfl.ads -o a-nallfl.o
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: profile of "Sin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-24 14:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2020-10-24 14:56 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 10:21 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (38 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-24 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried it on powerpc64 yesterday and it built on the systems where it had
failed previously although there were some new Ada test case failures. I'll
give it another run to see if it is still OK or not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-24 14:56 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-27 10:21 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 10:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (37 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-27 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It still fails for me with g:2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746
CommitDate: Mon Oct 26 19:05:53 2020 +0100
s390x:
[11466s] +===========================GNAT BUG
DETECTED==============================+
[11466s] | 11.0.0 20201026 (experimental) [revision
2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746] (s390x-suse-linux) |
[11466s] | Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access
|
[11466s] | Error detected at a-btgbso.adb:68:25
|
[11466s] | Please submit a bug report; see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ .
|
[11466s] | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug.
|
[11466s] | Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report.
|
[11466s] | Include the exact command that you entered.
|
[11466s] | Also include sources listed below.
|
[11466s]
+==========================================================================+
riscv64:
[ 8509s]
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-11.0.0+git180542/obj-riscv64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-11.0.0+git180542/obj-riscv64-suse-linux/./gcc/
-B/usr/riscv64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/riscv64-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem
/usr/riscv64-suse-linux/include -isystem /usr/riscv64-suse-linux/sys-include
-c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc a-nuaufl.ads -o a-nuaufl.o
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: profile of "Sin" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: profile of "Cos" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: profile of "Tan" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: profile of "Exp" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: profile of "Sqrt" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: profile of "Log" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: profile of "Acos" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: profile of "Asin" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: profile of "Atan" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: profile of "Sinh" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: profile of "Cosh" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: profile of "Tanh" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return
value
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on
argument 1
[ 8509s] a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: profile of "Pow" doesn't match the
builtin it binds
[ 8509s] make[7]: *** [../gcc-interface/Makefile:302: a-nallfl.o] Error 1
ppc:
[ 5103s] /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-11.0.0+git180542/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-11.0.0+git180542/obj-powerpc64-suse-linux/./gcc/
-B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem
/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/include -isystem
/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I../../../../libatomic/config/powerpc -I../../../../libatomic/config/posix
-I../../../../libatomic -I. -Wall -Werror -pthread -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection
-Werror=return-type -g -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -m64 -MT gcas.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/gcas.Tpo -c -o gcas.lo ../../../../libatomic/gcas.c
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:281:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:284:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:287:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:290:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:293:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:296:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:299:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:302:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:305:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:308:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:311:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:314:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:317:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:320:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:323:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:326:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:329:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:332:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:335:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:338:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:341:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:344:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:347:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:350:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:353:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:356:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:359:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:362:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:365:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:368:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:371:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:374:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:377:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:380:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:383:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:386:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:389:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:392:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:395:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:398:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:401:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:404:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:407:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:410:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:413:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:416:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:419:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:422:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:425:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:428:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:431:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:434:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:437:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:440:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:443:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:446:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:449:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:452:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:455:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:458:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:461:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:464:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:467:29: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:659:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:662:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:665:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:668:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:671:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:674:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:677:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:680:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:683:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:686:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:689:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:692:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:695:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:698:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:701:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:704:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:707:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:710:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:713:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:716:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:719:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:722:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:725:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:728:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:731:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:734:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:737:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:740:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:743:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:746:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:749:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:752:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:755:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:758:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:761:22: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:764:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:767:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:770:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:773:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:776:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:779:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:782:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:785:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:788:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:791:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:794:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:797:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:800:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:803:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:806:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:809:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:812:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:815:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:818:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:821:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:824:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:827:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:830:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:833:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:836:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:839:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:842:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:845:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] i-cexten.ads:848:23: integer type definition bounds out of range
[ 5103s] make[7]: *** [../gcc-interface/Makefile:299: g-calend.o] Error 1
[ 5103s] make[7]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-27 10:21 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-27 10:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 12:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (36 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-27 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> It still fails for me with g:2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746
> Commit Date: Mon Oct 26 19:05:53 2020 +0100
The PowerPC64 issue is different, let me have a quick look at it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-27 10:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-27 12:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 12:35 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (35 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-27 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This builds for me on powerpc64-linux, so I gather it's on powerpc64le-linux?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-27 12:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-27 12:35 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 14:51 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (34 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-27 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Builds fine for me on powerpc64 LE and BE.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-27 12:35 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-27 14:51 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 17:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (33 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-27 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49451&action=edit
Build log
It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the build
log.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-27 14:51 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-27 17:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 3:23 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
` (32 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the
> build log.
What's this beast exactly? I'm afraid the build log is useless here, it would
be better to post the configure line and the CC or CXX variables if any.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-27 17:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-28 3:23 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 10:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (31 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-28 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49456
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49456&action=edit
fix for riscv targets
> Still broken
Sorry, it's the first I hear of this problem on riscv.
The fix is target-specific. Here's one for riscv*.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-28 3:23 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-28 10:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (30 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-28 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31643fa3e994749bd2da7b35846f1958f8823b8d
commit r11-4472-g31643fa3e994749bd2da7b35846f1958f8823b8d
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date: Wed Oct 28 07:54:33 2020 -0300
[PR97504] riscv needs wraplf for aux_long_long_float too
riscv is another platform on which GNAT maps Long_Long_Float to double
rather than long double, so we have to explicitly avoid the long
double intrinsics.
for gcc/ada/ChangeLog
PR ada/97504
* Makefile.rtl (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS> <riscv*-*-*>: Use wraplf
version of Aux_Long_Long_Float.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-28 10:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (29 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-29 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #16)
> > It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the
> > build log.
>
> What's this beast exactly? I'm afraid the build log is useless here, it
> would be better to post the configure line and the CC or CXX variables if
> any.
It's a build log from OpenSUSE OBS, so it contains all that you requested.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (28 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-29 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49465&action=edit
Build log for s390x
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:38 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-29 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49466
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49466&action=edit
Build log for ppc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-29 9:38 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 11:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-29 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #17)
> Created attachment 49456 [details]
> fix for riscv targets
>
> > Still broken
>
> Sorry, it's the first I hear of this problem on riscv.
> The fix is target-specific. Here's one for riscv*.
I can confirm riscv* is fixed now. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-29 9:38 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-29 11:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 18:26 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (25 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-29 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> It's a build log from OpenSUSE OBS, so it contains all that you requested.
AFAICS this log is for a native compiler:
[ 131s] checking build system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
[ 131s] checking host system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
[ 131s] checking target system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
but I gather that --with-cpu=default32 somehow forces it to default to 32-bit,
making it really powerpc-suse-linux-gnu under the hood? Again this Debian-like
abomination if you ask me, which probably fools the logic in Makefile.rtl.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-29 11:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-29 18:26 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-30 8:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-29 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |matz at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #23)
> > It's a build log from OpenSUSE OBS, so it contains all that you requested.
>
> AFAICS this log is for a native compiler:
>
> [ 131s] checking build system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
> [ 131s] checking host system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
> [ 131s] checking target system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
>
> but I gather that --with-cpu=default32 somehow forces it to default to
> 32-bit, making it really powerpc-suse-linux-gnu under the hood? Again this
> Debian-like abomination if you ask me, which probably fools the logic in
> Makefile.rtl.
@Richi, Michael: Can you please comment about what we precisely build?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-29 18:26 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-30 8:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-30 10:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-30 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #23)
> > It's a build log from OpenSUSE OBS, so it contains all that you requested.
>
> AFAICS this log is for a native compiler:
>
> [ 131s] checking build system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
> [ 131s] checking host system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
> [ 131s] checking target system type... powerpc64-suse-linux-gnu
>
> but I gather that --with-cpu=default32 somehow forces it to default to
> 32-bit, making it really powerpc-suse-linux-gnu under the hood? Again this
> Debian-like abomination if you ask me, which probably fools the logic in
> Makefile.rtl.
Yes, we're building a 64bit compiler defaulting to -m32. Our
"ppc" target was never a true 32bit system but a 64bit system with a
32bit "default" runtime and 64bit multilibs, so most binaries in the
system were 32bit binaries but select ones could be 64bit.
Note the GCC binaries themselves become 32bit binaries as well (the way
we use it the host compiler is the very same, powerpc64-linux compiler
defaulting to 32bit code generation).
For "ppc64" this infrastructure is also used to build 32bit runtimes
for packages that do not multilib themselves (so we cannot really abandone
it completely).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-30 8:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-30 10:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-30 13:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-30 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #26 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49471
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49471&action=edit
Tentative fix for the SuSE PowerPC compiler
Martin, can you give it a try when you get a chance?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-30 10:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-10-30 13:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:24 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-10-30 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #49471|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49472&action=edit
Slightly better tentative fix
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2020-10-30 13:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-05 16:24 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-05 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #27)
> Created attachment 49472 [details]
> Slightly better tentative fix
Unfortunately, it still fails.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 16:24 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-05 16:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-05 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #29 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49508&action=edit
ppc_log with patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 16:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-05 16:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-05 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #49472|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49510
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49510&action=edit
Tentative fix #2
With the missing ampersand.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 16:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-05 16:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-06 10:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-05 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Unfortunately, it still fails.
OK, can you try the new one?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-05 16:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-06 10:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-19 14:57 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-06 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #32 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #31)
> > Unfortunately, it still fails.
>
> OK, can you try the new one?
This one works, thanks for it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-06 10:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-19 14:57 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-20 14:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-19 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #33 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also affects hppa*-*-hpux11*.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-19 14:57 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-20 14:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-27 12:53 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-20 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #34 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Still fails on hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/
-B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc
-11/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-11/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/lib/
-isystem /opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-11/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/include -isystem
/opt/gnu/gcc
/gcc-11/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include -fchecking=1 -c -g -O2 -fPIC -W
-W
all -gnatpg -nostdinc a-nallfl.ads -o a-nallfl.o
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: profile of "Sin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:51:13: warning: profile of "Cos" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:54:13: warning: profile of "Tan" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:57:13: warning: profile of "Exp" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:60:13: warning: profile of "Sqrt" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:63:13: warning: profile of "Log" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:66:13: warning: profile of "Acos" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:69:13: warning: profile of "Asin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:72:13: warning: profile of "Atan" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:75:13: warning: profile of "Sinh" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:78:13: warning: profile of "Cosh" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:81:13: warning: profile of "Tanh" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on return value
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on argument 1
a-nallfl.ads:84:13: warning: profile of "Pow" doesn't match the builtin it
binds
make[7]: *** [../gcc-interface/Makefile:302: a-nallfl.o] Error 1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-20 14:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-27 12:53 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-27 13:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-27 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #35 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> Created attachment 49465 [details]
> Build log for s390x
Hello.
The s390x build failure is still preset. Can you please take a look?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-27 12:53 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-27 13:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-27 16:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-27 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #36 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The s390x build failure is still preset. Can you please take a look?
This one looks unrelated to r11-4029 or other Ada changes. Do you know which
revision has introduced it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-27 13:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-27 16:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-29 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-27 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #37 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49638&action=edit
Fix for hppa-hpux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-27 16:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-29 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-03 18:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-29 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #38 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin <danglin@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4612c4d09d7d18a6c6345b57a9bb5e249b182fa4
commit r11-5519-g4612c4d09d7d18a6c6345b57a9bb5e249b182fa4
Author: John David Anglin <danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Sun Nov 29 15:57:40 2020 +0000
Fix PR ada/97504 on hppa*-*-hpux*.
2020-11-29 John David Anglin <danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/ada/
PR ada/97504
* Makefile.rtl (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS) <hppa*-*-hpux*>: Use wraplf
version of Aux_Long_Long_Float.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (38 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-29 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-03 18:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-04 8:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-03 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |schwab@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 98127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (39 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-03 18:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-04 8:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-07 8:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-04 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #40 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 98134 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (40 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-04 8:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-07 8:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-17 8:24 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-12-07 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #41 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthias Klose <doko@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad9c120a019ba4222bb062017da2db9711652dc3
commit r11-5812-gad9c120a019ba4222bb062017da2db9711652dc3
Author: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 09:40:53 2020 +0100
Fix PR ada/97504 for mips*-linux
2020-12-07 Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
PR ada/97504
* Makefile.rtl (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS) <mips*-*-linux*>: Use wraplf
version of Aux_Long_Long_Float.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (41 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-07 8:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-12-17 8:24 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-01-14 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2020-12-17 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.d
| |e
--- Comment #42 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
Ada bootstrap on m68k is broken as well.
Full buildlog in:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot&arch=m68k&ver=1%3A20201214-1&stamp=1608126919&raw=0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (42 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-17 8:24 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2021-01-14 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14 9:30 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-14 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |WAITING
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What's the state here - which targets are still affected?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (43 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-14 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-14 9:30 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14 9:45 ` doko at debian dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-14 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #44 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can confirm that s390x target is fine now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (44 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-14 9:30 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-14 9:45 ` doko at debian dot org
2021-01-14 10:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: doko at debian dot org @ 2021-01-14 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #45 from Matthias Klose <doko at debian dot org> ---
I think this one can be closed. There's still PR98228 for s390x.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (45 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-14 9:45 ` doko at debian dot org
@ 2021-01-14 10:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-14 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Comment #46 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Closing then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (46 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-14 10:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-13 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 23:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 23:03 ` macro at orcam dot me.uk
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-13 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #47 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2
commit r12-7220-g4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Date: Sun Feb 13 22:57:21 2022 +0000
[Ada] PR ada/98724: Alpha/Linux/libada: Use wraplf for Aux_Long_Long_Float
Use the Long Long Float wrapper in terms of Long Float for Alpha/Linux
targets as well, fixing gnatlib compilation errors:
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on result
[enabledby default]
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on parameter 1
[enabled by default]
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: profile of "Sin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds [enabled by default]
etc. with the `alpha-linux-gnu' target.
gcc/ada/
PR ada/98724
PR ada/97504
* Makefile.rtl (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS) <alpha*-*-linux*>: Use
wraplf version of Aux_Long_Long_Float.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (47 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-13 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-13 23:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 23:03 ` macro at orcam dot me.uk
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-13 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #48 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki
<macro@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72b0526bd4582338228ab81088b73dbf1ca565ee
commit r11-9565-g72b0526bd4582338228ab81088b73dbf1ca565ee
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Date: Sun Feb 13 22:57:21 2022 +0000
[Ada] PR ada/98724: Alpha/Linux/libada: Use wraplf for Aux_Long_Long_Float
Use the Long Long Float wrapper in terms of Long Float for Alpha/Linux
targets as well, fixing gnatlib compilation errors:
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on result
[enabledby default]
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: intrinsic binding type mismatch on parameter 1
[enabled by default]
a-nallfl.ads:48:13: warning: profile of "Sin" doesn't match the builtin it
binds [enabled by default]
etc. with the `alpha-linux-gnu' target.
gcc/ada/
PR ada/98724
PR ada/97504
* Makefile.rtl (LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS) <alpha*-*-linux*>: Use
wraplf version of Aux_Long_Long_Float.
(cherry picked from commit 4493c5a2030d9191761d159067815b5f0325a9d2)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (48 preceding siblings ...)
2022-02-13 23:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-13 23:03 ` macro at orcam dot me.uk
49 siblings, 0 replies; 51+ messages in thread
From: macro at orcam dot me.uk @ 2022-02-13 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #49 from Maciej W. Rozycki <macro at orcam dot me.uk> ---
*** Bug 98724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 51+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-13 23:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-20 15:21 [Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 15:29 ` [Bug ada/97504] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-10-21 6:07 ` [Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-21 8:48 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
2020-10-22 18:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 6:14 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 6:21 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 9:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 9:43 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-23 9:50 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
2020-10-24 14:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2020-10-24 14:56 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 10:21 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 10:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 12:31 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 12:35 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 14:51 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-27 17:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 3:23 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-28 10:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:37 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 9:38 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 11:45 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-29 18:26 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-30 8:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-30 10:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-30 13:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:24 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:57 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-05 16:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-06 10:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-19 14:57 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-20 14:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-27 12:53 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-27 13:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-27 16:20 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-29 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-03 18:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-04 8:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-07 8:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-17 8:24 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-01-14 9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14 9:30 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14 9:45 ` doko at debian dot org
2021-01-14 10:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 22:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 23:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13 23:03 ` macro at orcam dot me.uk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).