public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jehelset at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/97587] New: [coroutines] promise_type constructor is called with original parameters, not parameter copies Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:35:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-97587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97587 Bug ID: 97587 Summary: [coroutines] promise_type constructor is called with original parameters, not parameter copies Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jehelset at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 49443 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49443&action=edit Program that results in assertion-failure due to wrong arguments to promise. The promise-type constructor should be called with the parameter copies from the coroutine-frame. I couldn't quite understand that this is supposed to be the case from the current draft of the standard, but I got some help from Lewis Baker who also referred me to this rewording, where in the previous version it is clear: https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/commit/0b4ab68a54e197eba9d894a8f91270bb0dcdb546 The attached code triggers an assertion that show that this is not the case on gcc. I initially had the problem on gcc-10.2.0, but reproduced it on gcc-trunk on godbolt. Compile either version with -fcoroutines, or see https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/j16Wqx. I speculated that the logic here, https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc#L4491-L4494, was inverted. It seemed to pass the copied version of a by-reference parameter, but the original version of a by-value parameter. The opposite would not trigger the assertion. But I am not that familiar.
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 5:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-27 5:35 jehelset at gmail dot com [this message] 2021-02-16 8:47 ` [Bug c++/97587] " iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-25 19:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-22 22:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-24 12:45 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-97587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).