public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:49:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-97787-4-sSshaDFXp2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-97787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|target                      |lto
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20)
> Indeed already the name, .LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0, hints at that this should be a
> local symbol.  Not sure why we end up with a .reloc then.
> 
>         ld      $25,%got_disp(.LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0)($28)
> .LEHB26 = .
>         .reloc  1f,R_MIPS_JALR,.LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0
> 1:      jalr    $25
> 
> this seems to be in _ZN4Sass6Parser16parse_parametersEv

So 64bit MIPS n64 ABI with -mxgot does all function calls via loading an
address from the GOT, the .reloc there is to say to the linker to see if it can
relax it to be a direct jump (with link) rather than the indirect jump.

Looking into the cp/method.c code, I see we are creating an alias called
.LTHUNK5 for a function which seems to be fine.  So either we are not outputing
the correct name or the way local aliases are not being handled correctly when
splitting up the LTO partitions; -flto-partition=none is a hint there.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-25 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-10 20:09 [Bug lto/97787] New: " bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-11  7:37 ` [Bug lto/97787] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11  7:39 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11 14:14 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-11 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-12 18:52 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-13  8:35 ` [Bug target/97787] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-13 19:12 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-16 12:30 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-01-16 13:15 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-16 13:31 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-16 13:55 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-16 14:10 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-18  8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-22 12:04 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-22 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-22 16:53 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-23 12:17 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-23 13:04 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-24 12:47 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-25  8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-25 10:16 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-25 10:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-25 10:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-01-25 11:05 ` [Bug lto/97787] " xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-25 11:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-09  7:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 10:39 ` [Bug lto/97787] [10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 11:19 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2022-03-22 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 11:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:42 ` [Bug lto/97787] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:38 ` [Bug lto/97787] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-97787-4-sSshaDFXp2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).