public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:19:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-97787-4-tbSZ2FR4j8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-97787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed already the name, .LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0, hints at that this should be a
local symbol. Not sure why we end up with a .reloc then.
ld $25,%got_disp(.LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0)($28)
.LEHB26 = .
.reloc 1f,R_MIPS_JALR,.LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0
1: jalr $25
this seems to be in _ZN4Sass6Parser16parse_parametersEv
Maybe it's possible to reduce the testcase by bisecting the object files
necessary to produce the bogus LTRANS assembly? From that one can start
reducing the source of the necessary object files.
Another interesting bit would be to see the IPA dumps of the broken LTRANS
unit. If you add -fdump-ipa-all-details to the link command you should get
dump files alongside the ltrans temp files.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 20:09 [Bug lto/97787] New: " bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-11 7:37 ` [Bug lto/97787] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11 7:39 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11 14:14 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-11 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-12 18:52 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-13 8:35 ` [Bug target/97787] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-13 19:12 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2020-11-16 12:30 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-01-16 13:15 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-16 13:31 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-16 13:55 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-16 14:10 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-18 8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-22 12:04 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-22 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-22 16:53 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-23 12:17 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-23 13:04 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-24 12:47 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-25 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-01-25 10:16 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-25 10:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-25 10:49 ` [Bug lto/97787] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-25 11:05 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2021-01-25 11:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-09 7:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 10:39 ` [Bug lto/97787] [10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 11:19 ` xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
2022-03-22 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-22 11:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:42 ` [Bug lto/97787] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:38 ` [Bug lto/97787] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-97787-4-tbSZ2FR4j8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).