public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
@ 2020-11-17 17:37 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-11-17 18:00 ` [Bug c++/97878] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 more replies)
0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2020-11-17 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Bug ID: 97878
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at
cp/constexpr.c:6825
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Affects versions down to r7 :
$ cat z1.cc
extern int a[];
auto [b] {a};
$ g++-6 -c z1.cc
z1.cc:2:6: error: expected unqualified-id before '[' token
auto [b] {a};
^
$ g++-11-20201115 -c z1.cc
z1.cc:2:12: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at
cp/constexpr.c:6825
2 | auto [b] {a};
| ^
0x67e549 cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr
../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c:6824
0x680c0c maybe_constant_value(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c:7093
0x7cec1c store_init_value(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc,
vl_embed>**, int)
../../gcc/cp/typeck2.c:747
0x6c410d check_initializer
../../gcc/cp/decl.c:6909
0x6c552e cp_finish_decl(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool, tree_node*, int)
../../gcc/cp/decl.c:7827
0x72fde4 cp_parser_decomposition_declaration
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:14225
0x72fde4 cp_parser_simple_declaration
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:13867
0x75307a cp_parser_declaration
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:13640
0x75390a cp_parser_translation_unit
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:4806
0x75390a c_parse_file()
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:44595
0x81d252 c_common_parse_file()
../../gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1196
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2020-11-17 18:00 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 19:18 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-17 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-17
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-11-17 18:00 ` [Bug c++/97878] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-17 19:18 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-18 8:18 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-17 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems to have started with r244639.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-11-17 18:00 ` [Bug c++/97878] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 19:18 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-18 8:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 14:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-18 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE
|cxx_eval_outermost_constant |in
|_expr, at |cxx_eval_outermost_constant
|cp/constexpr.c:6825 |_expr, at
| |cp/constexpr.c:6825
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-18 8:18 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-03 14:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-03 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With
extern int a[];
auto [b] = a;
it is just error-recovery bug rather than ice-on-invalid-code:
pr97878-3.C:2:12: error: initializer fails to determine size of ‘<structured
bindings>’
2 | auto [b] = a;
| ^
pr97878-3.C:2:12: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr,
at cp/constexpr.c:7127
0xaa8260 cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr
../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c:7127
0xaa9a81 maybe_constant_init_1
../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c:7593
0xaa9b0b maybe_constant_init(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c:7610
0xaa98e5 fold_non_dependent_init(tree_node*, int, bool, tree_node*)
../../gcc/cp/constexpr.c:7564
0xe4f994 store_init_value(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc,
vl_embed>**, int)
../../gcc/cp/typeck2.c:767
0xb3807b check_initializer
../../gcc/cp/decl.c:7028
0xb3d512 cp_finish_decl(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool, tree_node*, int)
../../gcc/cp/decl.c:7946
0xcbda72 cp_parser_decomposition_declaration
../../gcc/cp/parser.c:14663
The clang++ diagnostics doesn't make any sense either:
error: cannot decompose non-class, non-array type 'int *'
but doesn't crash the compiler.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-03 14:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-03 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-03 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 50122
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50122&action=edit
gcc11-pr97878.patch
Untested fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-03 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-05 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 9:23 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-05 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b229baa75ce4627d1bd38f2d3dcd91af1a7071db
commit r11-7120-gb229baa75ce4627d1bd38f2d3dcd91af1a7071db
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 5 10:22:07 2021 +0100
c++: Fix ICE with structured binding initialized to incomplete array
[PR97878]
We ICE on the following testcase, for incomplete array a on auto [b] { a };
without
giving any kind of diagnostics, with auto [c] = a; during error-recovery.
The problem is that we get too far through check_initializer and e.g.
store_init_value -> constexpr stuff can't deal with incomplete array types.
As the type of the structured binding artificial variable is always
deduced,
I think it is easiest to diagnose this early, even if they have array types
we'll need their deduced type to be complete rather than just its element
type.
2021-02-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97878
* decl.c (check_array_initializer): For structured bindings,
require
the array type to be complete.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp54.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-05 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-05 9:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-19 23:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-05 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
|in |cxx_eval_outermost_constant
|cxx_eval_outermost_constant |_expr, at
|_expr, at |cp/constexpr.c:6825
|cp/constexpr.c:6825 |
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-05 9:23 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-19 23:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-20 8:07 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b7f2d3eae16dd629ae7ae40bb76f4bb0099f441
commit r10-9464-g8b7f2d3eae16dd629ae7ae40bb76f4bb0099f441
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 5 10:22:07 2021 +0100
c++: Fix ICE with structured binding initialized to incomplete array
[PR97878]
We ICE on the following testcase, for incomplete array a on auto [b] { a };
without
giving any kind of diagnostics, with auto [c] = a; during error-recovery.
The problem is that we get too far through check_initializer and e.g.
store_init_value -> constexpr stuff can't deal with incomplete array types.
As the type of the structured binding artificial variable is always
deduced,
I think it is easiest to diagnose this early, even if they have array types
we'll need their deduced type to be complete rather than just its element
type.
2021-02-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97878
* decl.c (check_array_initializer): For structured bindings,
require
the array type to be complete.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp54.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit b229baa75ce4627d1bd38f2d3dcd91af1a7071db)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-19 23:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-20 8:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-20 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in |[8/9 Regression] ICE in
|cxx_eval_outermost_constant |cxx_eval_outermost_constant
|_expr, at |_expr, at
|cp/constexpr.c:6825 |cp/constexpr.c:6825
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for 10.3 too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-20 8:07 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 16:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-20 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c85df8968b00acc934396d7461a4a5ac6ddedd1
commit r9-9416-g5c85df8968b00acc934396d7461a4a5ac6ddedd1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 5 10:22:07 2021 +0100
c++: Fix ICE with structured binding initialized to incomplete array
[PR97878]
We ICE on the following testcase, for incomplete array a on auto [b] { a };
without
giving any kind of diagnostics, with auto [c] = a; during error-recovery.
The problem is that we get too far through check_initializer and e.g.
store_init_value -> constexpr stuff can't deal with incomplete array types.
As the type of the structured binding artificial variable is always
deduced,
I think it is easiest to diagnose this early, even if they have array types
we'll need their deduced type to be complete rather than just its element
type.
2021-02-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97878
* decl.c (check_array_initializer): For structured bindings,
require
the array type to be complete.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp54.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 8b7f2d3eae16dd629ae7ae40bb76f4bb0099f441)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-22 16:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-22 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4d046c7e828c0f81ad1f9dfa0418047028133fa
commit r8-10881-ge4d046c7e828c0f81ad1f9dfa0418047028133fa
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 5 10:22:07 2021 +0100
c++: Fix ICE with structured binding initialized to incomplete array
[PR97878]
We ICE on the following testcase, for incomplete array a on auto [b] { a };
without
giving any kind of diagnostics, with auto [c] = a; during error-recovery.
The problem is that we get too far through check_initializer and e.g.
store_init_value -> constexpr stuff can't deal with incomplete array types.
As the type of the structured binding artificial variable is always
deduced,
I think it is easiest to diagnose this early, even if they have array types
we'll need their deduced type to be complete rather than just its element
type.
2021-02-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97878
* decl.c (check_array_initializer): For structured bindings,
require
the array type to be complete.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp54.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 8b7f2d3eae16dd629ae7ae40bb76f4bb0099f441)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-22 16:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-22 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97878
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-22 17:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-17 17:37 [Bug c++/97878] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:6825 gscfq@t-online.de
2020-11-17 18:00 ` [Bug c++/97878] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 19:18 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-18 8:18 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 14:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-03 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 9:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 9:23 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9/10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-19 23:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-20 8:07 ` [Bug c++/97878] [8/9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 16:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).