public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/98341] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with Storage_Error stack overflow or erroneous memory access on m68k
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 11:30:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98341-4-ORiwhchtaG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98341-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341

--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #7)
> In other words, the bisect result isn't very useful here and I'd recommend
> investigating this change from scratch, getting a useful backtrace from gdb
> and understanding where this is crashing and then why.

I can certainly generate a backtrace in GDB, but I'm not an Ada expert which is
why I reported the issue and hoped that the author of the change would be able
to understand what the problem is.

It could also be possible that the change makes some assumptions of the
underlying ABI that may well be true for x86_64 but not m68k.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-07 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17  8:31 [Bug target/98341] New: " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-12-18  8:00 ` [Bug target/98341] " mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2020-12-22  8:44 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2020-12-22 15:29 ` mhillen at linux dot ibm.com
2020-12-26 20:19 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-01-14  8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 10:50 ` mikpelinux at gmail dot com
2021-02-04 10:58 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-02-04 11:05 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-07 11:30 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de [this message]
2021-02-07 12:01 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-07 12:03 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-04-09  8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:39 ` [Bug target/98341] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-02  9:02 ` reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
2021-05-02  9:32 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-02  9:33 ` [Bug target/98341] [11/12 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28  7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-23 10:06 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-02-23 10:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-23 10:33 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-02-24  9:57 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-04-21  7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-28 15:02 ` [Bug target/98341] [11/12/13 " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2022-04-28 16:02 ` [Bug target/98341] [11 " egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98341-4-ORiwhchtaG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).