public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "romain.geissler at amadeus dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/98465] Bogus warning stringop-overread wuth -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:49:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98465-4-DwHACiX3u7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465

--- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler <romain.geissler at amadeus dot com> ---
Hi Martin,

Thanks for your investigation.

I have a few questions:
 - Since the warning seems to be fully emitted by system headers, shouldn't it
be silenced by default ? Why isn't it the case here ? On compiler explorer,
"x86-64 gcc 10.2" and flags "-std=gnu++20 -O2" I get no warning, yet with flags
"-std=gnu++20 -O2 -Wsystem-headers" I get a -Wstringop-overflow warning about
the same problem. Meaning that for stringop-overflow system headers seems to be
taken into account, but not for stringop-overread, is that expected ?
 - I understood why you did not reproduce the bug with gcc 11, my test case,
and flags "-std=gnu++20 -O2". It looks like Compiler explorer forces "-g" by
default. And it seems debug output generation does affect the warning. With
flags "-std=gnu++20 -O2 -g0" (effectively disable debug information generation)
I get no warning, while with "-std=gnu++20 -O2 -g" I get the stringop-overread
warning. Again, gcc 10 doesn't seem to be impacted by debug output generation
to trigger this warning, is this expected ?

There seems to be a strange interaction between -Wsystem-headers and -g in gcc
11 which I don't understand. See the following matrix:
 - "-std=gnu++20 -O2 -Wno-system-headers -g0" --> no warning
 - "-std=gnu++20 -O2 -Wno-system-headers -g"  --> warning
 - "-std=gnu++20 -O2 -Wsystem-headers -g0"    --> warning
 - "-std=gnu++20 -O2 -Wsystem-headers -g"     --> warning

(this last matrix was tested on compiler explorer).

I am confused.

Cheers,
Romain

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-30 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-28 18:36 [Bug middle-end/98465] New: " romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2020-12-28 20:54 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-30 12:49 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com [this message]
2020-12-30 13:22 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2020-12-30 21:25 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06 22:38 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06 22:59 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06 23:14 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 20:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 18:19 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 18:41 ` law at redhat dot com
2021-01-13 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 19:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 19:30 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14  2:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-19 19:00 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 23:20 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] [11 Regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread with " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 14:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 15:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 15:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 16:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 16:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 17:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 20:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 21:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 10:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-08 18:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-09 11:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-09 11:35 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-19 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 19:53 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15  3:55 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15  9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15  9:55 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15 10:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 10:50 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15 12:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 12:40 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 19:23 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-17 10:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98465-4-DwHACiX3u7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).