public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/98465] Bogus warning stringop-overread wuth -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:54:35 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-98465-4-pGs0m25Dr0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-98465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465 Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Keywords| |diagnostic, | |missed-optimization Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Blocks| |97048 Last reconfirmed| |2020-12-28 Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.0 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'm not sure why I don't see the warning for the test case in my build but I can reproduce it (as well as a -Warray-bounds) by compiling the translation unit obtained from the test case and with system header markers removed with either GCC 10 or 11: $ g++ -O2 -S -Wall -std=gnu++20 pr98465.C pr98465.C: In function ‘void f(std::string&)’: pr98465.C:22316:20: warning: offset ‘2’ outside bounds of constant string [-Warray-bounds] 22316 | this->_S_copy(__p, __s + __len2 - __len1, __len2); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pr98465.C:22843:12: note: ‘constantString’ declared here 22843 | const char constantString[] = {42, 53}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In static member function ‘static constexpr std::char_traits<char>::char_type* std::char_traits<char>::copy(std::char_traits<char>::char_type*, const char_type*, std::size_t)’, inlined from ‘void f(std::string&)’ at pr98465.C:19983:21: pr98465.C:9051:49: warning: ‘void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, long unsigned int)’ reading 2 bytes from a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overread] 9051 | return static_cast<char_type*>(__builtin_memcpy(__s1, __s2, __n)); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pr98465.C: In function ‘void f(std::string&)’: pr98465.C:22843:12: note: at offset 2 into source object ‘constantString’ of size 2 22843 | const char constantString[] = {42, 53}; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The -Warray-bounds instance comes from a call to c_strlen() made during the ccp2 pass for the following IL: void f (struct string & s) { _14 = MEM[(const struct basic_string *)s_2(D)]._M_dataplus._M_p; ... <bb 22> [local count: 179779816]: if (_14 >= &MEM <const char[2]> [(void *)&constantString + 2B]) goto <bb 23>; [50.00%] else goto <bb 24>; [50.00%] ... <bb 24> [local count: 44944954]: if (_14 <= &constantString) goto <bb 25>; [50.00%] else goto <bb 26>; [50.00%] <bb 25> [local count: 22472477]: __builtin_memcpy (_14, &MEM <const char[2]> [(void *)&constantString + 2B], 2); <<< -Warray-bounds goto <bb 55>; [100.00%] ... } The warning is correct: the call is invalid. It results from the following transformations: Folding statement: _45 = 2 - _6; Queued stmt for removal. Folds to: 2 Folding statement: _46 = &constantString + _45; Queued stmt for removal. Folds to: &MEM <const char[2]> [(void *)&constantString + 2B] Folding statement: __builtin_memcpy (__p_18, _46, 2); Folded into: __builtin_memcpy (_14, &MEM <const char[2]> [(void *)&constantString + 2B], 2); The invalid call survives until expansion which is when the -Wstringop-overread is issued. I suspect the default -Wno-system-headers setting has something to do with the warning being masked. In the IL above, the pointer inequalities that lead to the transformation are the result of the call to _M_disjunct(__s) in std::string::_M_replace, presumably done to identify and cope with self-insertion. Since constantString is a distinct object, the invalid call is unreachable, but without more context GCC can't figure that out. Annotating the std::string::_M_dataplus._M_p pointer as one that cannot alias a declared object (other than the _M_local_buf member) would be one way to avoid the warning (and improve the codegen at the same time). IIRC, I suggested something like that in the past but no nothing has materialized yet. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048 [Bug 97048] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overread warnings
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-28 20:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-28 18:36 [Bug middle-end/98465] New: " romain.geissler at amadeus dot com 2020-12-28 20:54 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-12-30 12:49 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] " romain.geissler at amadeus dot com 2020-12-30 13:22 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com 2020-12-30 21:25 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-06 22:38 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-06 22:59 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-06 23:14 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-07 20:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 18:19 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 18:41 ` law at redhat dot com 2021-01-13 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 19:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 19:30 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-14 2:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-19 19:00 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-20 23:20 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] [11 Regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread with " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 14:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 15:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 15:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 16:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 16:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 17:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 20:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-04 21:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-05 10:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-08 18:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-09 11:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-09 11:35 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-19 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 19:53 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-15 3:55 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com 2022-02-15 9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-15 9:55 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com 2022-02-15 10:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-15 10:50 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com 2022-02-15 12:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-15 12:40 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com 2022-02-15 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-15 19:23 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com 2022-02-17 10:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-98465-4-pGs0m25Dr0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).