public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/98465] Bogus warning stringop-overread wuth -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:54:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98465-4-pGs0m25Dr0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic,
                   |                            |missed-optimization
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
             Blocks|                            |97048
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-12-28
      Known to fail|                            |10.2.0, 11.0

--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm not sure why I don't see the warning for the test case in my build but I
can reproduce it (as well as a -Warray-bounds) by compiling the translation
unit obtained from the test case and with system header markers removed with
either GCC 10 or 11:

$ g++ -O2 -S -Wall -std=gnu++20 pr98465.C
pr98465.C: In function ‘void f(std::string&)’:
pr98465.C:22316:20: warning: offset ‘2’ outside bounds of constant string
[-Warray-bounds]
22316 |       this->_S_copy(__p, __s + __len2 - __len1, __len2);
      |       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pr98465.C:22843:12: note: ‘constantString’ declared here
22843 | const char constantString[] = {42, 53};
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In static member function ‘static constexpr std::char_traits<char>::char_type*
std::char_traits<char>::copy(std::char_traits<char>::char_type*, const
char_type*, std::size_t)’,
    inlined from ‘void f(std::string&)’ at pr98465.C:19983:21:
pr98465.C:9051:49: warning: ‘void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, long
unsigned int)’ reading 2 bytes from a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overread]
 9051 |  return static_cast<char_type*>(__builtin_memcpy(__s1, __s2, __n));
      |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pr98465.C: In function ‘void f(std::string&)’:
pr98465.C:22843:12: note: at offset 2 into source object ‘constantString’ of
size 2
22843 | const char constantString[] = {42, 53};
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The -Warray-bounds instance comes from a call to c_strlen() made during the
ccp2 pass for the following IL:

void f (struct string & s)
{
  _14 = MEM[(const struct basic_string *)s_2(D)]._M_dataplus._M_p;
  ...
  <bb 22> [local count: 179779816]:
  if (_14 >= &MEM <const char[2]> [(void *)&constantString + 2B])
    goto <bb 23>; [50.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 24>; [50.00%]
  ...
  <bb 24> [local count: 44944954]:
  if (_14 <= &constantString)
    goto <bb 25>; [50.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 26>; [50.00%]

  <bb 25> [local count: 22472477]:
  __builtin_memcpy (_14, &MEM <const char[2]> [(void *)&constantString + 2B],
2);   <<< -Warray-bounds
  goto <bb 55>; [100.00%]
  ...
}

The warning is correct: the call is invalid.  It results from the following
transformations:

Folding statement: _45 = 2 - _6;
Queued stmt for removal.  Folds to: 2
Folding statement: _46 = &constantString + _45;
Queued stmt for removal.  Folds to: &MEM <const char[2]> [(void
*)&constantString + 2B]
Folding statement: __builtin_memcpy (__p_18, _46, 2);
Folded into: __builtin_memcpy (_14, &MEM <const char[2]> [(void
*)&constantString + 2B], 2);

The invalid call survives until expansion which is when the -Wstringop-overread
is issued.  I suspect the default -Wno-system-headers setting has something to
do with the warning being masked.

In the IL above, the pointer inequalities that lead to the transformation are
the result of the call to _M_disjunct(__s) in std::string::_M_replace,
presumably done to identify and cope with self-insertion.  Since constantString
is a distinct object, the invalid call is unreachable, but without more context
GCC can't figure that out.  Annotating the std::string::_M_dataplus._M_p
pointer as one that cannot alias a declared object (other than the _M_local_buf
member) would be one way to avoid the warning (and improve the codegen at the
same time).  IIRC, I suggested something like that in the past but no nothing
has materialized yet.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048
[Bug 97048] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overread warnings

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-28 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-28 18:36 [Bug middle-end/98465] New: " romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2020-12-28 20:54 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-12-30 12:49 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] " romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2020-12-30 13:22 ` romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
2020-12-30 21:25 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06 22:38 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06 22:59 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-06 23:14 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-07 20:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 18:19 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 18:41 ` law at redhat dot com
2021-01-13 18:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 19:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 19:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-13 19:30 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-14  2:21 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-19 19:00 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-20 23:20 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] [11 Regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread with " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 14:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 15:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 15:54 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 16:02 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 16:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 17:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 20:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-04 21:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 10:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-08 18:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-09 11:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-09 11:35 ` [Bug middle-end/98465] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-19 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 19:53 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15  3:55 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15  9:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15  9:55 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15 10:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 10:50 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15 12:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 12:40 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-15 12:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-15 19:23 ` Randy at miningrigrentals dot com
2022-02-17 10:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98465-4-pGs0m25Dr0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).