public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints
@ 2020-12-31  6:57 johelegp at gmail dot com
  2021-07-22 14:08 ` [Bug c++/98486] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: johelegp at gmail dot com @ 2020-12-31  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486

            Bug ID: 98486
           Summary: Variable template specialization doesn't account for
                    primary's constraints
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
               URL: https://godbolt.org/z/jon9ea
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: johelegp at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

See https://godbolt.org/z/jon9ea.
```C++
template<class>concept C=false;
template<C>int v;
struct X{};
template<>X v<X>;
```

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/98486] Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints
  2020-12-31  6:57 [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints johelegp at gmail dot com
@ 2021-07-22 14:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-09-15 18:20 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-22 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-07-22
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Blocks|                            |67491
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/98486] Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints
  2020-12-31  6:57 [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints johelegp at gmail dot com
  2021-07-22 14:08 ` [Bug c++/98486] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-15 18:20 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-09-16 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-15 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.3
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/98486] Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints
  2020-12-31  6:57 [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints johelegp at gmail dot com
  2021-07-22 14:08 ` [Bug c++/98486] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-09-15 18:20 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-16 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-06 14:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-06 14:18 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-16 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486

--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e2e65a46d2674bed53afd211493876ee2b79453

commit r12-3585-g2e2e65a46d2674bed53afd211493876ee2b79453
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 16 15:03:55 2021 -0400

    c++: constrained variable template issues [PR98486]

    This fixes some issues with constrained variable templates:

      - Constraints aren't checked when explicitly specializing a variable
        template.
      - Constraints aren't attached to a static data member template at
        parse time.
      - Constraints don't get propagated when (partially) instantiating a
        static data member template, so we need to make sure to look up
        constraints using the most general template during satisfaction.

            PR c++/98486

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constraint.cc (get_normalized_constraints_from_decl): Always
            look up constraints using the most general template.
            * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Set constraints on a static data
            member template.
            * pt.c (determine_specialization): Check constraints on a
            variable template.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-var-templ1.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-var-templ1a.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-var-templ1b.C: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/98486] Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints
  2020-12-31  6:57 [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints johelegp at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-09-16 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-06 14:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-10-06 14:18 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-06 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:729cf2ea979f396e706625b1669087d5920b8c2a

commit r11-9081-g729cf2ea979f396e706625b1669087d5920b8c2a
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 16 15:03:55 2021 -0400

    c++: constrained variable template issues [PR98486]

    This fixes some issues with constrained variable templates:

      - Constraints aren't checked when explicitly specializing a variable
        template.
      - Constraints aren't attached to a static data member template at
        parse time.
      - Constraints don't get propagated when (partially) instantiating a
        static data member template, so we need to make sure to look up
        constraints using the most general template during satisfaction.

            PR c++/98486

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constraint.cc (get_normalized_constraints_from_decl): Always
            look up constraints using the most general template.
            * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Set constraints on a static data
            member template.
            * pt.c (determine_specialization): Check constraints on a
            variable template.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-var-templ1.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-var-templ1a.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-var-templ1b.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 2e2e65a46d2674bed53afd211493876ee2b79453)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/98486] Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints
  2020-12-31  6:57 [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints johelegp at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-10-06 14:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-06 14:18 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-06 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 11.3 and 12.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-06 14:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-31  6:57 [Bug c++/98486] New: Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints johelegp at gmail dot com
2021-07-22 14:08 ` [Bug c++/98486] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-15 18:20 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-16 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-06 14:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-06 14:18 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).