public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/98655] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') @ 2021-01-13 7:08 asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-01-13 8:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98655] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-01-13 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98655 Bug ID: 98655 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: powerpc-*-linux-gnu gcc-11.0.0-alpha20210110 snapshot (g:872373360dab259d51caa002ff1722ff84746d8b) configured for rs6000 target ICEs when compiling the following testcase, reduced from testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97521.c, w/ -O1 -fno-tree-forwprop: typedef unsigned char __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))) V; typedef unsigned long long __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16))) W; V foo (W f) { W g = ((W) { 0, 1 } < 1) <= (0 < f); return (V) (g[0]); } % powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu-gcc-11.0.0 -O1 -fno-tree-forwprop -w -c mvzpqney.c mvzpqney.c: In function 'foo': mvzpqney.c:5:1: error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' 5 | foo (W f) | ^~~ _10 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_9, 1, 0>; mvzpqney.c:5:1: error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' _12 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_11, 1, 0>; mvzpqney.c:5:1: error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' _16 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_15, 1, 1>; mvzpqney.c:5:1: error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' _18 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_17, 1, 1>; during GIMPLE pass: veclower2 mvzpqney.c:5:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed 0xe59f67 verify_gimple_in_cfg(function*, bool) /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20210110/work/gcc-11-20210110/gcc/tree-cfg.c:5467 0xd27b0e execute_function_todo /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20210110/work/gcc-11-20210110/gcc/passes.c:2042 0xd2821c do_per_function /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20210110/work/gcc-11-20210110/gcc/passes.c:1687 0xd2821c execute_todo /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20210110/work/gcc-11-20210110/gcc/passes.c:2096 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/98655] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') 2021-01-13 7:08 [Bug tree-optimization/98655] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-01-13 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 10:47 ` asolokha at gmx dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-13 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98655 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- can't reproduce with a cross to ppc64le. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/98655] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') 2021-01-13 7:08 [Bug tree-optimization/98655] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-01-13 8:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98655] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-13 10:47 ` asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-03-22 9:14 ` asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-03-22 9:19 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-01-13 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98655 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com> --- My configuration is 32-bit BE. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/98655] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') 2021-01-13 7:08 [Bug tree-optimization/98655] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-01-13 8:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98655] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 10:47 ` asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-03-22 9:14 ` asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-03-22 9:19 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-03-22 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98655 --- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha <asolokha at gmx dot com> --- I cannot reproduce it w/ yesterday's gcc-11.0.1-alpha20210321 snapshot (g:fc24ea2374259d401a46ce3526688b7e79d4cc13). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/98655] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') 2021-01-13 7:08 [Bug tree-optimization/98655] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') asolokha at gmx dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-03-22 9:14 ` asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-03-22 9:19 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-22 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98655 Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thus fixed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-22 9:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-01-13 7:08 [Bug tree-optimization/98655] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref') asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-01-13 8:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98655] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-13 10:47 ` asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-03-22 9:14 ` asolokha at gmx dot com 2021-03-22 9:19 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).