public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:46:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-98856-4-BxbSK5ZpJL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-98856-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856

--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 50300
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50300&action=edit
preprocessed source of the important Botan TU

This is the full preprocessed source of the TU.  When compiled with -Ofast
-march=znver2 look for poly_double_n_le in the assembly, in the prologue the
function jumps based on kernel size - size 16 is the important one:

        cmpq    $16, %rdx
        je      .L54
...
.L54:
        .cfi_restore_state
        vmovdqu (%rsi), %xmm4
        vmovdqa %xmm4, 16(%rsp)
        movq    24(%rsp), %rdx
        vmovdqa 16(%rsp), %xmm5
        shrq    $63, %rdx
        imulq   $135, %rdx, %rcx
        movq    16(%rsp), %rdx
        vmovq   %rcx, %xmm0
        vpsllq  $1, %xmm5, %xmm1
        shrq    $63, %rdx
        vpinsrq $1, %rdx, %xmm0, %xmm0
        vpxor   %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
        vmovdqu %xmm0, (%rdi)
        leaq    -16(%rbp), %rsp
        popq    %r12
        popq    %r13
        popq    %rbp
        .cfi_remember_state
        .cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
        ret

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-05  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27 14:28 [Bug tree-optimization/98856] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-27 14:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98856] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-27 14:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28  7:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28  8:44 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28  9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-28 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 11:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 12:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 13:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 16:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 17:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-05 19:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-08 15:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-04 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-04 15:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-04 16:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-04 17:56 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-04 18:12 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-05  7:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-05  7:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-03-05  8:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-05 10:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-03-05 10:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-05 11:56 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-05 12:25 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-05 12:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-05 12:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-05 12:52 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-05 12:55 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-03-05 13:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-05 13:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2021-03-05 14:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 10:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 13:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 15:46 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-13 10:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28  7:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-21 13:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-21  7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-17 21:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11/12/13/14 " lukebenes at hotmail dot com
2023-04-18  9:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-29 10:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-98856-4-BxbSK5ZpJL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).