public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/99306] New: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16
@ 2021-02-27 18:33 unlvsur at live dot com
2021-02-27 19:00 ` [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler " unlvsur at live dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: unlvsur at live dot com @ 2021-02-27 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306
Bug ID: 99306
Summary: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of
'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: unlvsur at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
../../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/shared_ptr.cc:39:14: error: alignment
of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16
39 | static M m[mask + 1];
| ^
make[5]: *** [Makefile:648: shared_ptr.lo] Error 1
make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
../../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-locale_init.cc: In member
function 'void std::locale::_Impl::_M_init_extra(void*, void*, const char*,
const char*)':
../../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-locale_init.cc:140:50: warning:
unused parameter 'clocm' [-Wunused-parameter]
140 | locale::_Impl::_M_init_extra(void* cloc, void* clocm,
| ~~~~~~^~~~~
../../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cow-locale_init.cc:141:61: warning:
unused parameter '__smon' [-Wunused-parameter]
141 | const char* __s, const char* __smon)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
make[4]: *** [Makefile:764: all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: *** [Makefile:568: all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile:493: all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [Makefile:11838: all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:970: all] Error 2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16
2021-02-27 18:33 [Bug libstdc++/99306] New: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16 unlvsur at live dot com
@ 2021-02-27 19:00 ` unlvsur at live dot com
2021-03-01 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-01 16:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: unlvsur at live dot com @ 2021-02-27 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
Created attachment 50268
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50268&action=edit
shared_ptr optional no alignment patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16
2021-02-27 18:33 [Bug libstdc++/99306] New: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16 unlvsur at live dot com
2021-02-27 19:00 ` [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler " unlvsur at live dot com
@ 2021-03-01 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-01 16:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-01 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-03-01
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
__gnu_cxx::__mutex&
get_mutex(unsigned char i)
{
// increase alignment to put each lock on a separate cache line
struct alignas(64) M : __gnu_cxx::__mutex { };
static M m[mask + 1];
return m[i];
there's __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ one could use as bound but that will usually
be lower than the max ofile alignment and on most targets likely less
than 64. That value (64) looks like it should be target dependent anyway
(configury?)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16
2021-02-27 18:33 [Bug libstdc++/99306] New: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16 unlvsur at live dot com
2021-02-27 19:00 ` [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler " unlvsur at live dot com
2021-03-01 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-01 16:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-01 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99306
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's intended to be the cacheline size, so would use
std::hardware_destructive_interference_size, but that's not implemented yet for
the reasons given in PR 88466. And also because it's just a very verbose way to
say 64 :-P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-01 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-27 18:33 [Bug libstdc++/99306] New: bootstrap failure on msdosdjgpp: error: alignment of 'm' is greater than maximum object file alignment 16 unlvsur at live dot com
2021-02-27 19:00 ` [Bug libstdc++/99306] cross compiler " unlvsur at live dot com
2021-03-01 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-01 16:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).