public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/99309] [10/11 Regression] Segmentation fault with __builtin_constant_p usage at -O2
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:46:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99309-4-fgQbpMeSrv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99309-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99309

--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99309
> 
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> > As discussed, I can prepare patch to make inliner to redirect
> > __builtin_constant_p to __builtin_true whenever inliner detect that the
> > expression is compile time ocnstant.  This will avoid us eventually hitting
> > unreachable when late optimizations forget to make the transformation.
> 
> I'm quite worried about that, the point of guarding something with
> __builtin_constant_p is about the hope that the argument of that builtin will
> evaluate to constant in the conditional block guarded by it.
> By folding __builtin_constant_p to true if it sees it as constant but not
> actually propagating that constant to all uses of that expression we could have
> the condition folded to true, but if SRA or FRE etc. is disabled or isn't able
> to optimize it, we wouldn't have it constant.
Yes, it is not good (this is why I did not implement it earlier).
However you can trigger same problem without inline.  Just put enough
statements between the conditional and use so AO walk oracles gives
up...

Honza

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-28 10:33 [Bug c++/99309] New: " gcc at mailinator dot com
2021-03-01  9:31 ` [Bug c++/99309] [10/11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-01  9:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 15:45 ` [Bug ipa/99309] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 14:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 18:18 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 18:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 18:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz [this message]
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-15  9:49 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-24 13:59 ` [Bug ipa/99309] [10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:43 ` [Bug ipa/99309] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:39 ` [Bug ipa/99309] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-17  0:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99309-4-fgQbpMeSrv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).