public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99422] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn building glibc pthread_create
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:44:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99422-4-8dPfcfeYqL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #22 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Could you check the patch on the failed bootstraps. I have no access to
Unfortunately, it didn't help. I continue to revert the patches for PRs
99378, 99422, and 99454 locally for now.
> solaris machines.
Technically, you have ;-) There's gcc211 in the cfarm, but
unfortunately the installation is highly nonstandard, doesn't follow
cfarm conventions, and lacks GNAT. While I do have a local gcc
installation on the box without these issues, I agree it would be quite
tedious to use. I suspect that the same issue occurs on Linux/sparc64,
too (gcc202), but trying that on a machine that's pretty unreliable
wouldn't be my idea of fun.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-06 1:31 [Bug target/99422] New: " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-06 9:51 ` [Bug target/99422] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-06 9:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-06 10:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-06 18:57 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2021-03-07 2:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-07 2:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-07 19:01 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-07 19:49 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-07 20:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-07 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 14:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 14:31 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 18:53 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 18:58 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 19:05 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 19:33 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2021-03-08 20:45 ` raj.khem at gmail dot com
2021-03-08 21:16 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2021-03-10 14:06 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 16:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 18:46 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 21:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-10 21:21 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 9:44 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message]
2021-03-11 10:13 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 19:11 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 21:34 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-11 23:38 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-12 17:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-16 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-16 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-18 19:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-99422-4-8dPfcfeYqL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).