public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/99447] [11 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lookup_page_table_entry
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 09:00:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99447-4-0Ad4BN1GRP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99447-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447

--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 50485
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50485&action=edit
small refactoring

this patch moves the removal to release_body and removes the calls on those
paths where removal is done just after call to it (as opposed to being done
earlier or via reset cal).

But still there is no code path where it should make difference. Pehraps the
assert will catch something interesting. Tests are running.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-07 10:35 [Bug lto/99447] New: " doko at debian dot org
2021-03-07 10:41 ` [Bug lto/99447] " doko at debian dot org
2021-03-07 11:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08  8:46 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08  9:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-08 10:57 ` doko at debian dot org
2021-03-17 12:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-17 12:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-17 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-17 12:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-17 12:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-17 13:30 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2021-03-25 15:27 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-26 11:03 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-26 11:18 ` [Bug ipa/99447] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 18:20 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 21:45 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-30  7:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-30  8:49 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-30  9:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-03-30 12:16 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31  9:18 ` doko at debian dot org
2021-03-31  9:18 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31  9:19 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31  9:33 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2021-03-31  9:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31  9:39 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2021-03-31 18:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 18:12 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-01 12:50 ` doko at debian dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99447-4-0Ad4BN1GRP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).