public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99708] __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ not defined on powerpc64le-linux
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:51:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99708-4-VocsVLrg9y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99708-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99708
--- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #36)
> Is this fixed now?
Yes, I think the macros are defined consistently with the types now. Let's
close it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-15 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 9:56 [Bug target/99708] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 16:42 ` [Bug target/99708] " segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 17:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-23 20:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 14:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 20:57 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 21:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 15:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 15:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 15:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 16:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 16:35 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 17:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 17:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 18:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 18:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 23:03 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 23:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 13:46 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 17:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 18:07 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 18:07 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 18:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 19:03 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 19:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 20:22 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-05 16:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-06 1:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 20:46 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 9:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 23:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 23:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-11 23:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-12 0:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-20 2:36 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-15 2:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-15 8:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-15 8:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 15:48 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-99708-4-VocsVLrg9y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).