public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99708] __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ not defined on powerpc64le-linux
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:42:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99708-4-hCTXwWMcja@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99708-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99708

--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, the __SIZEOF_* macros do not say whether some type can be used.  This is
true for all targets!

What would it be useful for to define these macros?  They all are equivalent to

#define SIXTEEN 16

:-)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22  9:56 [Bug target/99708] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 16:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-03-22 17:38 ` [Bug target/99708] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-23 20:37 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 14:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 20:57 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 21:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 15:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 15:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 15:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 16:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 16:35 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 17:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 17:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 18:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 18:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 23:03 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-03 23:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04  9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 13:46 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 17:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 18:07 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 18:07 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 18:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 19:03 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 19:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-04 20:22 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-05 16:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-06  1:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-07 20:46 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10  9:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 23:02 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-10 23:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-11 23:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-12  0:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-20  2:36 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-15  2:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-15  8:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-15  8:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-10 15:48 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99708-4-hCTXwWMcja@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).