public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
@ 2021-03-23 10:59 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-23 10:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-23 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
Bug ID: 99726
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in
create_intersect_range_checks_index, at
tree-data-ref.c:1855 since
r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Since the revision the following is causing ICE:
$ cat ~/Programming/testcases/ice.i
extern int aa[][1024];
int aa_4294967295_1;
long foo4_n, foo4_m;
unsigned int main_i;
void main() {
{
unsigned j;
for (; main_i < foo4_m; main_i++) {
j = 1;
for (; j < foo4_n; j++)
aa[main_i][j] = aa_4294967295_1 * aa[main_i - 1][j + 1];
}
}
}
$ gcc ~/Programming/testcases/ice.i -flive-patching=inline-clone -mavx512vbmi2
-O2 -floop-nest-optimize -ftree-loop-vectorize -ftrapv -m32
during GIMPLE pass: vect
/home/marxin/Programming/testcases/ice.i: In function ‘main’:
/home/marxin/Programming/testcases/ice.i:5:6: internal compiler error: in
create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:2197
5 | void main() {
| ^~~~
0x842c04 create_intersect_range_checks_index
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:2197
0x19d8dcc create_intersect_range_checks
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:2580
0x19d8dcc create_runtime_alias_checks(loop*, vec<dr_with_seg_len_pair_t,
va_heap, vl_ptr>*, tree_node**)
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-data-ref.c:2663
0x111a23e vect_create_cond_for_alias_checks(_loop_vec_info*, tree_node**)
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c:3329
0x111bd45 vect_loop_versioning(_loop_vec_info*, gimple*)
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c:3418
0x11138a6 vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*, gimple*)
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:9459
0x1140fff try_vectorize_loop_1
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:1104
0x1141ce0 vectorize_loops()
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:1243
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-23 10:59 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 8:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-23 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |9.3.0
Last reconfirmed| |2021-03-23
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-23 10:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-24 8:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-24 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-23 10:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 8:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-29 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 16:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-29 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Slightly cleaned up testcase:
extern int a[256][1024];
int b;
long c, d;
unsigned int e;
int
main ()
{
for (; e < d; e++)
for (unsigned j = 1; j < c; j++)
a[e][j] = b * a[e - 1][j + 1];
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-29 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-29 16:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-30 12:08 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-29 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
And -flive-patching=inline-clone -mavx512f -O2 -floop-nest-optimize
-ftree-loop-vectorize -ftrapv -m32
is sufficient to trigger it.
I'm afraid I'm lost in what exactly the code wants to do.
dr_a.dr:
#(Data Ref:
# bb: 57
# stmt: _231 = a[_238][_242];
# ref: a[_238][_242];
# base_object: a;
# Access function 0: {(unsigned int) (_239 - graphite_IV.18_206) + 2, +,
4294967295}_6
# Access function 1: {((unsigned int) (graphite_IV.18_206 + _234) + e.6_19) +
4294967295, +, 1}_6
#)
dr_b.dr:
#(Data Ref:
# bb: 57
# stmt: a[_250][_254] = _243;
# ref: a[_250][_254];
# base_object: a;
# Access function 0: {(unsigned int) (_251 - graphite_IV.18_206) + 1, +,
4294967295}_6
# Access function 1: {(unsigned int) (graphite_IV.18_206 + _247) + e.6_19, +,
1}_6
#)
DR_STEP (dr_a.dr) == DR_STEP (dr_b.dr) == 4092, so it is not neg_step:
bool neg_step = tree_int_cst_compare (DR_STEP (dr_a.dr), size_zero_node) < 0;
/* Index must evaluate in the same direction as DR. */
gcc_assert (!neg_step || tree_int_cst_sign_bit (idx_step) == 1);
but this doesn't check anything if neg_step is false, rather than ensuring it
has the same direction.
And
offset_int abs_idx_step = offset_int::from (wi::to_wide (idx_step),
SIGNED);
if (neg_step)
abs_idx_step = -abs_idx_step;
offset_int::from will treat the unsigned int idx_step of -1U as -1 and the
asserts fail because it is not non-negative.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-29 16:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-30 12:08 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-30 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-30 12:08 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-31 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-31 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5c7accfb56a7347008f629be4c7344dd849b1b1
commit r11-7935-gb5c7accfb56a7347008f629be4c7344dd849b1b1
Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date: Wed Mar 31 19:34:01 2021 +0100
data-ref: Tighten index-based alias checks [PR99726]
create_intersect_range_checks_index tries to create a runtime
alias check based on index comparisons. It looks through the
access functions for the two DRs to find a SCEV for the loop
that is being versioned and converts a DR_STEP-based check
into an index-based check.
However, there isn't any reliable sign information in the types,
so the code expects the value of the IV step (when interpreted as
signed) to be negative iff the DR_STEP (when interpreted as signed)
is negative.
r10-4762 added another assert related to this assumption and the
assert fired for the testcase in the PR. The sign of the IV step
didn't match the sign of the DR_STEP.
I think this is actually showing what was previously a wrong-code bug.
The signs didn't match because the DRs contained *two* access function
SCEVs for the loop being versioned. It doesn't look like the code
is set up to deal with this, since it checks each access function
independently and treats it as the sole source of DR_STEP.
The patch therefore moves the main condition out of the loop.
This also has the advantage of not building a tree for one access
function only to throw it away if we find an inner function that
makes the comparison invalid.
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/99726
* tree-data-ref.c (create_intersect_range_checks_index): Bail
out if there is more than one access function SCEV for the loop
being versioned.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/99726
* gcc.target/i386/pr99726.c: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-31 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-03-31 20:36 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-02 8:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-31 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in
|create_intersect_range_chec |create_intersect_range_chec
|ks_index, at |ks_index, at
|tree-data-ref.c:1855 since |tree-data-ref.c:1855 since
|r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae |r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae
|36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 |36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-31 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-02 8:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-02 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e53c0696113cced90561e79ade27445f6c0926d0
commit r11-7957-ge53c0696113cced90561e79ade27445f6c0926d0
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Apr 2 10:07:50 2021 +0200
testsuite: Fix up gcc.target/i386/pr99726.c test [PR99726]
-m32 shouldn't be used in gcc.target/i386/ testcases, people do
test with -m32/-m64 to get 32-bit compilation tested.
And, -floop-nest-optimize is a graphite optimization, so might not
be enabled in all gcc builds.
2021-04-02 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/99726
* gcc.target/i386/pr99726.c: Remove -m32 from dg-options. Move
-floop-nest-optimize to dg-additional-options guarded on fgraphite
effective target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-02 8:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-23 9:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-23 9:11 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-08 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.3 |10.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-23 9:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-23 9:11 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-23 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
<rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e2db68a77fb211898a024c5a7ad7c4449c7e355
commit r10-9749-g7e2db68a77fb211898a024c5a7ad7c4449c7e355
Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date: Fri Apr 23 10:09:38 2021 +0100
data-ref: Tighten index-based alias checks [PR99726]
create_intersect_range_checks_index tries to create a runtime
alias check based on index comparisons. It looks through the
access functions for the two DRs to find a SCEV for the loop
that is being versioned and converts a DR_STEP-based check
into an index-based check.
However, there isn't any reliable sign information in the types,
so the code expects the value of the IV step (when interpreted as
signed) to be negative iff the DR_STEP (when interpreted as signed)
is negative.
r10-4762 added another assert related to this assumption and the
assert fired for the testcase in the PR. The sign of the IV step
didn't match the sign of the DR_STEP.
I think this is actually showing what was previously a wrong-code bug.
The signs didn't match because the DRs contained *two* access function
SCEVs for the loop being versioned. It doesn't look like the code
is set up to deal with this, since it checks each access function
independently and treats it as the sole source of DR_STEP.
The patch therefore moves the main condition out of the loop.
This also has the advantage of not building a tree for one access
function only to throw it away if we find an inner function that
makes the comparison invalid.
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/99726
* tree-data-ref.c (create_intersect_range_checks_index): Bail
out if there is more than one access function SCEV for the loop
being versioned.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/99726
* gcc.target/i386/pr99726.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit b5c7accfb56a7347008f629be4c7344dd849b1b1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-23 9:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-23 9:11 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-23 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99726
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-23 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-23 10:59 [Bug tree-optimization/99726] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-data-ref.c:1855 since r10-4762-gf9d6338bd15ce1fae36bf25d3a0545e9678ddc58 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-23 10:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24 8:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-29 16:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-30 12:08 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 18:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-31 20:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/99726] [10 " rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-02 8:09 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-23 9:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-23 9:11 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).