public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope
@ 2021-04-01 16:58 nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-01 17:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/99871] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-01 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

            Bug ID: 99871
           Summary: #includes inside push visibility scope
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

I ran into this working on module bugs (99823).  While it is not affecting that
debugging, it has code smell.

We have the following:
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
.. some decls
#include <other header>
... more decls
#pragma GCC visibility pop

The case I ran into is 
# 33 "../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/nested_exception.h" 3
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
...
#include "type_traits"
...
#pragma GCC visibility pop


That visibility pragma will not affect the visibility of decls in type_traits,
when that is translated to an include.  Fortunately, you asked for default
visibility.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-01 17:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-01 18:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-01 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-04-01

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-01 17:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/99871] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-01 18:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-06 14:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-01 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder if there's a reason we don't just put the visibility on the namespace
the way we do elsewhere:

namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)

I will do that, or just move the pragma after the includes.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-01 17:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/99871] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-01 18:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-06 14:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-06 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |12.0

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We use the #pragma before using #include in most of the libsupc++ headers, and
also <tr1/specfun.h>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-06 14:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-06  8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-19 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org            |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06  8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-06  8:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|12.0                        |12.2

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 12.1 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.2.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-05-06  8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06  8:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-06 13:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-06 14:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|12.2                        |13.0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-05-06  8:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06 13:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-05-06 14:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:488d268728bf701ac76a1392eaed202c80be3843

commit r13-152-g488d268728bf701ac76a1392eaed202c80be3843
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 6 15:11:15 2021 +0100

    libstdc++: Do not use #include inside push visibility scope [PR99871]

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/99871
            * include/bits/specfun.h: Use visibility attribute on namespace,
            instead of pragma push/pop.
            * libsupc++/compare: Likewise.
            * libsupc++/exception: Likewise.
            * libsupc++/exception.h: Likewise.
            * libsupc++/exception_ptr.h: Likewise.
            * libsupc++/initializer_list: Likewise.
            * libsupc++/nested_exception.h: Likewise.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/99871] #includes inside push visibility scope
  2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-05-06 13:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06 14:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for gcc 13.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-06 14:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-01 16:58 [Bug libstdc++/99871] New: #includes inside push visibility scope nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-01 17:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/99871] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-01 18:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 14:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06  8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06  8:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 13:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 14:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).