public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
@ 2021-04-07 7:00 fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-04-07 7:39 ` [Bug ipa/99951] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com @ 2021-04-07 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
Bug ID: 99951
Summary: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
By ipa_param_adjustments::modify_call(), a call statement with return value
might be replaced to a new void-return call. But the original return value SSA
is not released, which would give us garbage SSA when traversing
FOR_EACH_SSA_NAME.
In the following code, all uses of stmt's lhs are redirected to a new one, and
it becomes unused, but is never released from SSA name table.
if (tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt))
{
if (!m_skip_return)
gimple_call_set_lhs (new_stmt, lhs);
else if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
{
/* LHS should now by a default-def SSA. Unfortunately default-def
SSA_NAMEs need a backing variable (or at least some code examining
SSAs assumes it is non-NULL). So we either have to re-use the
decl we have at hand or introdice a new one. */
tree repl = create_tmp_var (TREE_TYPE (lhs), "removed_return");
repl = get_or_create_ssa_default_def (cfun, repl);
SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (repl) = true;
imm_use_iterator ui;
use_operand_p use_p;
gimple *using_stmt;
FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (using_stmt, ui, lhs)
{
FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT (use_p, ui)
{
SET_USE (use_p, repl);
}
update_stmt (using_stmt);
}
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug ipa/99951] Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
2021-04-07 7:00 [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
@ 2021-04-07 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 1:38 ` fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-07 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-04-07
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|tree-ssa |11.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Martin, can you fix?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug ipa/99951] Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
2021-04-07 7:00 [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-04-07 7:39 ` [Bug ipa/99951] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-08 1:38 ` fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-04-08 7:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com @ 2021-04-08 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
--- Comment #2 from Feng Xue <fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com> ---
Can we report error in verify_ssa() when a non-default SSA's defining statement
has NULL bb, which is always a case that the statement is removed somewhere?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug ipa/99951] Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
2021-04-07 7:00 [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-04-07 7:39 ` [Bug ipa/99951] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 1:38 ` fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
@ 2021-04-08 7:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 9:25 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-08 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Feng Xue from comment #2)
> Can we report error in verify_ssa() when a non-default SSA's defining
> statement has NULL bb, which is always a case that the statement is removed
> somewhere?
We can, but that triggers way too often ... but be my guest chasing all of them
down. [we could also simply release them, eh]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug ipa/99951] Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
2021-04-07 7:00 [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-08 7:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-08 9:25 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-08 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I posted a patch calling release_ssa on the SSA_NAME to the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/567759.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug ipa/99951] Dead return value after modify_call() is not released
2021-04-07 7:00 [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-08 9:25 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-27 11:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-27 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor <jamborm@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eea82246290010addf7f6be71a71b51079b3cb5d
commit r12-149-geea82246290010addf7f6be71a71b51079b3cb5d
Author: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Date: Tue Apr 27 13:46:10 2021 +0200
ipa-sra: Release dead LHS SSA_NAME when removing it (PR 99951)
When IPA-SRA removes an SSA_NAME from a LHS of a call statement
because it is not necessary, it does not release it. This patch fixes
that.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2021-04-08 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR ipa/99951
* ipa-param-manipulation.c (ipa_param_adjustments::modify_call):
If removing a call statement LHS SSA name, release it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-27 11:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-07 7:00 [Bug ipa/99951] New: Dead return value after modify_call() is not released fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-04-07 7:39 ` [Bug ipa/99951] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 1:38 ` fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com
2021-04-08 7:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 9:25 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).