public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc(refs/users/meissner/heads/work048)] Force IBM long double for conversion test on PowerPC.
@ 2021-04-15 17:18 Michael Meissner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Meissner @ 2021-04-15 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3a758ca8fc07fe3558743d7eeacfbf6ac21723f

commit f3a758ca8fc07fe3558743d7eeacfbf6ac21723f
Author: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 15 13:17:45 2021 -0400

    Force IBM long double for conversion test on PowerPC.
    
    The test c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c explicit expects long double to use
    the IBM 128-bit extended double format.  In particular, some of the tests
    expect an infinity to be created if decimal values that are converted that are
    too large for IBM extended double.  However, the numbers do fit in the range
    for IEEE 128-bit format, since it has a larger exponent than the IBM 128-bit
    format.  The test fails because an infinity is not generated.
    
    This patch explicitly sets the long double type to IBM extended double.
    
    I have run tests on a little endian power9 system with 3 compilers.  There
    were no regressions with these patches, and the two tests in the following
    patches now work if the default long double is not IBM 128-bit:
    
        *   One compiler using the default IBM 128-bit format;
        *   One compiler using the IEEE 128-bit format; (and)
        *   One compiler using 64-bit long doubles.
    
    I have also tested compilers on a big endian power8 system with a compiler
    defaulting to power8 code generation and another with the default cpu
    set.  There were no regressions.
    
    Can I check this patch into the master branch?
    
    gcc/testsuite/
    2021-04-15  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
    
            * c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c: Force using IBM 128-bit long
            double.  Remove check for 64-bit long double.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c
index 95c433d2c24..35da07d1fa4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c
@@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
-/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! "powerpc*-*-linux*" } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target dfp } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target ppc_long_double_override_ibm128 } */
+/* { dg-add-options ppc_long_double_override_ibm128 } */
 
-/* Test decimal float conversions to and from IBM 128-bit long double. 
-   Checks are skipped at runtime if long double is not 128 bits.
-   Don't force 128-bit long doubles because runtime support depends
-   on glibc.  */
+/* We force the long double type to be IBM 128-bit because the CONVERT_TO_PINF
+   tests will fail if we use IEEE 128-bit floating point.  This is due to IEEE
+   128-bit having a larger exponent range than IBM 128-bit extended double.  So
+   tests that would generate an infinity with IBM 128-bit will generate a
+   normal number with IEEE 128-bit.  */
+
+/* Test decimal float conversions to and from IBM 128-bit long double.   */
 
 #include "convert.h"
 
@@ -36,9 +41,6 @@ CONVERT_TO_PINF (312, tf, sd, 1.6e+308L, d32)
 int
 main ()
 {
-  if (sizeof (long double) != 16)
-    return 0;
-
   convert_101 ();
   convert_102 ();


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-04-15 17:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-15 17:18 [gcc(refs/users/meissner/heads/work048)] Force IBM long double for conversion test on PowerPC Michael Meissner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).