public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r11-8222] c++: Fix empty base stores in cxx_eval_store_expression [PR100111]
@ 2021-04-16 15:44 Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-04-16 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35e8b38a91d9fb49a4759649576f15e76c129d99
commit r11-8222-g35e8b38a91d9fb49a4759649576f15e76c129d99
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Apr 16 17:37:07 2021 +0200
c++: Fix empty base stores in cxx_eval_store_expression [PR100111]
In r11-6895 handling of empty bases has been fixed such that non-lval
stores of empty classes are not added when the type of *valp doesn't
match the type of the initializer, but as this testcase shows it is
done only when *valp is non-NULL. If it is NULL, we still shouldn't
add empty class constructors if the type of the constructor elt *valp
points to doesn't match.
2021-04-16 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/100111
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Don't add CONSTRUCTORs
for empty classes into *valp when types don't match even when *valp
is NULL.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-100111.C: New test.
Diff:
---
gcc/cp/constexpr.c | 8 ++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-100111.C | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index b74bbac3cd2..0fb0ab44b39 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -5538,6 +5538,14 @@ cxx_eval_store_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (*valp)
= CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (init);
}
+ else if (TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR
+ && !same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (TREE_TYPE (init),
+ type))
+ {
+ /* See above on initialization of empty bases. */
+ gcc_assert (is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (init)) && !lval);
+ return init;
+ }
else
*valp = init;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-100111.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-100111.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..446d21d03c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-100111.C
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// PR c++/100111
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-fno-elide-constructors" }
+
+struct A {};
+struct B : A { int b; constexpr B (A x) : A(x), b() {} };
+struct C { B c; constexpr C () : c({}) {} } d;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-04-16 15:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-16 15:44 [gcc r11-8222] c++: Fix empty base stores in cxx_eval_store_expression [PR100111] Jakub Jelinek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).