public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r9-9430] expand: Fix ICE in store_bit_field_using_insv [PR93235]
@ 2021-04-20 23:33 Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-04-20 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d47377411652b67e258d81fb9e29a603556fd16
commit r9-9430-g5d47377411652b67e258d81fb9e29a603556fd16
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Mar 4 19:38:08 2021 +0100
expand: Fix ICE in store_bit_field_using_insv [PR93235]
The following testcase ICEs on aarch64. The problem is that
op0 is (subreg:HI (reg:HF ...) 0) and because we can't create a SUBREG of a
SUBREG and aarch64 doesn't have HImode insv, only SImode insv,
store_bit_field_using_insv tries to create (subreg:SI (reg:HF ...) 0)
which is not valid for the target and so gen_rtx_SUBREG ICEs.
The following patch fixes it by punting if the to be created SUBREG
doesn't validate, callers of store_bit_field_using_insv can handle
the fallback.
2021-03-04 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/93235
* expmed.c (store_bit_field_using_insv): Return false of xop0 is a
SUBREG and a SUBREG to op_mode can't be created.
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr93235.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 510ff5def87c70836fdbf832228661ae28e524b6)
Diff:
---
gcc/expmed.c | 13 ++++++++++---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93235.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c
index c5f5499c013..13a9f7c1b95 100644
--- a/gcc/expmed.c
+++ b/gcc/expmed.c
@@ -623,9 +623,16 @@ store_bit_field_using_insv (const extraction_insn *insv, rtx op0,
/* If xop0 is a register, we need it in OP_MODE
to make it acceptable to the format of insv. */
if (GET_CODE (xop0) == SUBREG)
- /* We can't just change the mode, because this might clobber op0,
- and we will need the original value of op0 if insv fails. */
- xop0 = gen_rtx_SUBREG (op_mode, SUBREG_REG (xop0), SUBREG_BYTE (xop0));
+ {
+ /* If such a SUBREG can't be created, give up. */
+ if (!validate_subreg (op_mode, GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (xop0)),
+ SUBREG_REG (xop0), SUBREG_BYTE (xop0)))
+ return false;
+ /* We can't just change the mode, because this might clobber op0,
+ and we will need the original value of op0 if insv fails. */
+ xop0 = gen_rtx_SUBREG (op_mode, SUBREG_REG (xop0),
+ SUBREG_BYTE (xop0));
+ }
if (REG_P (xop0) && GET_MODE (xop0) != op_mode)
xop0 = gen_lowpart_SUBREG (op_mode, xop0);
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93235.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93235.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..829ae13f199
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr93235.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* PR middle-end/93235 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing" } */
+
+struct sfp16 { __fp16 f; };
+struct sfp16
+foo (short x)
+{
+ struct sfp16 a;
+ *(short*)&a.f = x;
+ return a;
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-04-20 23:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-20 23:33 [gcc r9-9430] expand: Fix ICE in store_bit_field_using_insv [PR93235] Jakub Jelinek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).