public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-991] openmp: Fix up firstprivate+lastprivate clause handling [PR99928]
@ 2021-05-21 19:20 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-05-21 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5c1c7a96bc8d7062d2c35675f48131667498182

commit r12-991-gb5c1c7a96bc8d7062d2c35675f48131667498182
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri May 21 21:16:21 2021 +0200

    openmp: Fix up firstprivate+lastprivate clause handling [PR99928]
    
    The C/C++ clause splitting happens very early during construct parsing,
    but only the FEs later on handle possible instantiations, non-static
    member handling and array section lowering.
    In the OpenMP 5.0/5.1 rules, whether firstprivate is added to combined
    target depends on whether it isn't also mentioned in lastprivate or map
    clauses, but unfortunately I think such checks are much better done only
    when the FEs perform all the above mentioned changes.
    So, this patch arranges for the firstprivate clause to be copied or moved
    to combined target construct (as before), but sets flags on that clause,
    which tell the FE *finish_omp_clauses and the gimplifier it has been added
    only conditionally and let the FEs and gimplifier DTRT for these.
    
    2021-05-21  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR middle-end/99928
    gcc/
            * tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET): Define.
            * gimplify.c (enum gimplify_omp_var_data): Fix up
            GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS value, add GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.
            (omp_lastprivate_for_combined_outer_constructs): If combined target
            has GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set for the decl, change it to
            GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN.
            (gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): Set GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT for
            firstprivate clauses with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.
            (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses): For firstprivate clauses with
            OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT either clear that bit and
            OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET too, or remove it and
            let it be replaced by implicit map clause.
    gcc/c-family/
            * c-omp.c (c_omp_split_clauses): Set OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT
            on firstprivate clause copy going to target construct, and for
            target simd set also OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET bit.
    gcc/c/
            * c-typeck.c (c_finish_omp_clauses): Move firstprivate clauses with
            OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT to the end of the chain.  Don't error
            if a decl is mentioned both in map clause and in such firstprivate
            clause unless OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET is also set.
    gcc/cp/
            * semantics.c (finish_omp_clauses): Move firstprivate clauses with
            OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT to the end of the chain.  Don't error
            if a decl is mentioned both in map clause and in such firstprivate
            clause unless OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET is also set.
    gcc/testsuite/
            * c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c: Remove all xfails.
            * c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/c-family/c-omp.c                         | 11 +++++++
 gcc/c/c-typeck.c                             | 27 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/cp/semantics.c                           | 27 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/gimplify.c                               | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c  | 12 ++++----
 gcc/tree.h                                   |  5 ++++
 7 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-omp.c b/gcc/c-family/c-omp.c
index fb1a0d6041e..0945a1e5cc4 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-omp.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-omp.c
@@ -1733,10 +1733,21 @@ c_omp_split_clauses (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
 		{
 		  /* This must be #pragma omp target simd.  */
 		  s = C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_TARGET;
+		  OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (clauses) = 1;
+		  OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (clauses) = 1;
 		  break;
 		}
 	      c = build_omp_clause (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (clauses),
 				    OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE);
+	      /* firstprivate should not be applied to target if it is
+		 also lastprivate or on the combined/composite construct,
+		 or if it is mentioned in map clause.  OMP_CLAUSE_DECLs
+		 may need to go through FE handling though (instantiation,
+		 C++ non-static data members, array section lowering), so
+		 add the clause with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT and
+		 let *finish_omp_clauses and the gimplifier handle it
+		 right.  */
+	      OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c) = 1;
 	      OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c) = OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (clauses);
 	      OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (c) = cclauses[C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_TARGET];
 	      cclauses[C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_TARGET] = c;
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
index c3b85da1125..fc64ef96fb8 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
@@ -13936,6 +13936,7 @@ c_finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, enum c_omp_region_type ort)
      has been seen, -2 if mixed inscan/normal reduction diagnosed.  */
   int reduction_seen = 0;
   bool allocate_seen = false;
+  bool firstprivate_implicit_moved = false;
 
   bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL);
   bitmap_initialize (&generic_head, &bitmap_default_obstack);
@@ -14377,6 +14378,29 @@ c_finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, enum c_omp_region_type ort)
 	  break;
 
 	case OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE:
+	  if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+	      && !firstprivate_implicit_moved)
+	    {
+	      firstprivate_implicit_moved = true;
+	      /* Move firstprivate clauses with
+		 OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set to the end of
+		 clauses chain.  */
+	      tree cl = NULL, *pc1 = pc, *pc2 = &cl;
+	      while (*pc1)
+		if (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (*pc1) == OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE
+		    && OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (*pc1))
+		  {
+		    *pc2 = *pc1;
+		    pc2 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc2);
+		    *pc1 = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+		  }
+		else
+		  pc1 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+	      *pc2 = NULL;
+	      *pc1 = cl;
+	      if (pc1 != pc)
+		continue;
+	    }
 	  t = OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c);
 	  need_complete = true;
 	  need_implicitly_determined = true;
@@ -14398,6 +14422,9 @@ c_finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, enum c_omp_region_type ort)
 	      if (ort == C_ORT_ACC)
 		error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
 			  "%qD appears more than once in data clauses", t);
+	      else if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+		       && !OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (c))
+		/* Silently drop the clause.  */;
 	      else
 		error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
 			  "%qD appears both in data and map clauses", t);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 0d590c318fb..fffbe40613e 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -6519,6 +6519,7 @@ finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, enum c_omp_region_type ort)
   bool allocate_seen = false;
   tree detach_seen = NULL_TREE;
   bool mergeable_seen = false;
+  bool firstprivate_implicit_moved = false;
 
   bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL);
   bitmap_initialize (&generic_head, &bitmap_default_obstack);
@@ -6843,6 +6844,29 @@ finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, enum c_omp_region_type ort)
 	  break;
 
 	case OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE:
+	  if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+	      && !firstprivate_implicit_moved)
+	    {
+	      firstprivate_implicit_moved = true;
+	      /* Move firstprivate clauses with
+		 OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT set to the end of
+		 clauses chain.  */
+	      tree cl = NULL, *pc1 = pc, *pc2 = &cl;
+	      while (*pc1)
+		if (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (*pc1) == OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE
+		    && OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (*pc1))
+		  {
+		    *pc2 = *pc1;
+		    pc2 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc2);
+		    *pc1 = OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+		  }
+		else
+		  pc1 = &OMP_CLAUSE_CHAIN (*pc1);
+	      *pc2 = NULL;
+	      *pc1 = cl;
+	      if (pc1 != pc)
+		continue;
+	    }
 	  t = omp_clause_decl_field (OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c));
 	  if (t)
 	    omp_note_field_privatization (t, OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c));
@@ -6884,6 +6908,9 @@ finish_omp_clauses (tree clauses, enum c_omp_region_type ort)
 	      if (ort == C_ORT_ACC)
 		error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
 			  "%qD appears more than once in data clauses", t);
+	      else if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c)
+		       && !OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (c))
+		/* Silently drop the clause.  */;
 	      else
 		error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
 			  "%qD appears both in data and map clauses", t);
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
index 28bf1b0ba25..b62ea0efc1c 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -126,7 +126,10 @@ enum gimplify_omp_var_data
 
   /* Flag for GOVD_MAP: (struct) vars that have pointer attachments for
      fields.  */
-  GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS = 8388608,
+  GOVD_MAP_HAS_ATTACHMENTS = 0x4000000,
+
+  /* Flag for GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE: OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT.  */
+  GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT = 0x8000000,
 
   GOVD_DATA_SHARE_CLASS = (GOVD_SHARED | GOVD_PRIVATE | GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE
 			   | GOVD_LASTPRIVATE | GOVD_REDUCTION | GOVD_LINEAR
@@ -8586,13 +8589,24 @@ omp_lastprivate_for_combined_outer_constructs (struct gimplify_omp_ctx *octx,
 	  omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_LASTPRIVATE | GOVD_SEEN);
 	  continue;
 	}
-      if (octx->region_type == ORT_COMBINED_TARGET
-	  && splay_tree_lookup (octx->variables,
-				(splay_tree_key) decl) == NULL)
+      if (octx->region_type == ORT_COMBINED_TARGET)
 	{
-	  omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN);
-	  octx = octx->outer_context;
-	  break;
+	  splay_tree_node n = splay_tree_lookup (octx->variables,
+						 (splay_tree_key) decl);
+	  if (n == NULL)
+	    {
+	      omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN);
+	      octx = octx->outer_context;
+	    }
+	  else if (!implicit_p
+		   && (n->value & GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT))
+	    {
+	      n->value &= ~(GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE
+			    | GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT
+			    | GOVD_EXPLICIT);
+	      omp_add_variable (octx, decl, GOVD_MAP | GOVD_SEEN);
+	      octx = octx->outer_context;
+	    }
 	}
       break;
     }
@@ -8673,6 +8687,11 @@ gimplify_scan_omp_clauses (tree *list_p, gimple_seq *pre_p,
 	case OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE:
 	  flags = GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE | GOVD_EXPLICIT;
 	  check_non_private = "firstprivate";
+	  if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c))
+	    {
+	      gcc_assert (code == OMP_TARGET);
+	      flags |= GOVD_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT;
+	    }
 	  goto do_add;
 	case OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE:
 	  if (OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE_CONDITIONAL (c))
@@ -10532,6 +10551,18 @@ gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses (gimple_seq *pre_p, gimple_seq body, tree *list_p,
 	      remove = true;
 	      break;
 	    }
+	  if (OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c))
+	    {
+	      decl = OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (c);
+	      n = splay_tree_lookup (ctx->variables, (splay_tree_key) decl);
+	      if ((n->value & GOVD_MAP) != 0)
+		{
+		  remove = true;
+		  break;
+		}
+	      OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET (c) = 0;
+	      OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT (c) = 0;
+	    }
 	  /* FALLTHRU */
 	case OMP_CLAUSE_PRIVATE:
 	case OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f0c6232d27c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-15.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/* PR middle-end/99928 */
+
+int v;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  #pragma omp target parallel firstprivate (v) map(tofrom: v)	/* { dg-bogus "'v' appears both in data and map clauses" } */
+  v++;
+}
+
+void
+bar (void)
+{
+  #pragma omp target firstprivate (v) map (tofrom: v)	/* { dg-error "'v' appears both in data and map clauses" } */
+  v++;
+}
+
+void
+baz (void)
+{
+  int j;
+  #pragma omp target simd firstprivate (v) map (tofrom: v) private (j)	/* { dg-error "'v' appears both in data and map clauses" } */
+  for (int i = 0; i < 1; i++)
+    j = v;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c
index 67f590bb7ef..cf9c72d75b8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/pr99928-3.c
@@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ bar (void)
     #pragma omp section
     l07 = 2;
   }
-  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l08" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
-  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l08" "gimple" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead.  */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*lastprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead.  */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp for\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l08\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME.  */
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ bar (void)
   #pragma omp target parallel for firstprivate (l08) lastprivate (l08)
   for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
     l08 = i;
-  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l09" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
-  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l09" "gimple" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead.  */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp parallel\[^\n\r]*lastprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME: This should be on for instead.  */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp for\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l09\\)" "gimple" } } *//* FIXME.  */
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ bar (void)
   #pragma omp target parallel for simd firstprivate (l09) lastprivate (l09)
   for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
     l09 = i;
-  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l10" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
-  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp target\[^\n\r]*map\\(tofrom:l10" "gimple" } } */
+  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp target\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" } } */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "omp simd\[^\n\r]*firstprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" } } */
   /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "omp simd\[^\n\r]*lastprivate\\(l10\\)" "gimple" } } */
   #pragma omp target simd firstprivate (l10) lastprivate (l10)
diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
index 64612cfa368..37aca8963fe 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.h
+++ b/gcc/tree.h
@@ -1538,6 +1538,11 @@ class auto_suppress_location_wrappers
 #define OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_NO_REFERENCE(NODE) \
   TREE_PRIVATE (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE_CHECK (NODE, OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE))
 
+/* True on a FIRSTPRIVATE clause with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT also
+   set if target construct is the only one that accepts the clause.  */
+#define OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT_TARGET(NODE) \
+  TREE_PROTECTED (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE_CHECK (NODE, OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE))
+
 /* True on a LASTPRIVATE clause if a FIRSTPRIVATE clause for the same
    decl is present in the chain.  */
 #define OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE_FIRSTPRIVATE(NODE) \


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-05-21 19:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-21 19:20 [gcc r12-991] openmp: Fix up firstprivate+lastprivate clause handling [PR99928] Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).