public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-1167] xtensa: Fix 2 warnings during xtensa build [PR100841]
@ 2021-06-02 20:10 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-06-02 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50b1de860a58bf85b40a72219bc2fdfaf0dff355

commit r12-1167-g50b1de860a58bf85b40a72219bc2fdfaf0dff355
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 2 22:09:53 2021 +0200

    xtensa: Fix 2 warnings during xtensa build [PR100841]
    
    When building gcc targetting xtensa-linux, there are 2 warnings the PR
    complains about:
    ../../gcc/dwarf2cfi.c: In function ‘void init_one_dwarf_reg_size(int, machine_mode, rtx, machine_mode, init_one_dwarf_reg_state*)’:
    ../../gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: warning: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘const unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Wsign-compare]
      291 |   if (rnum >= DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS)
    ../../gcc/function.c: In function ‘void gen_call_used_regs_seq(rtx_insn*, unsigned int)’:
    ../../gcc/function.c:5897:63: warning: comparison of unsigned expression in ‘< 0’ is always false [-Wtype-limits]
     5897 |       if (crtl->uses_only_leaf_regs && LEAF_REG_REMAP (regno) < 0)
    which might during bootstrap or when configured with --enable-werror-always
    be turned into errors.
    
    The first one is the -Wsign-compare warning, in c-family we do:
    2281          /* Do not warn if the signed quantity is an unsuffixed integer
    2282             literal (or some static constant expression involving such
    2283             literals or a conditional expression involving such literals)
    2284             and it is non-negative.  */
    2285          if (tree_expr_nonnegative_warnv_p (sop, &ovf))
    2286            /* OK */;
    and so don't warn if that function determines the expression is
    non-negative.  But xtensa defines DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS as
    (16 + (something ? 0 : 1)) and that isn't handled by
    tree_expr_nonnegative_warnv_p, VRP can handle it of course, but that is much
    later.
    The second chunk rewrites it into a form that tree_expr_nonnegative_warnv_p
    can handle, in particular (something ? 16 : 16 + 1), where for COND_EXPRs
    that function checks both the 2nd and 3rd operand of the ternary operator
    and if both are nonnegative, returns true.
    
    The other warning has been introduced fairly recently; LEAF_REG_REMAP is
    currently used by 2 targets only, and is documented to yield -1 if a hard
    reg number can't be remapped and the remapped register number otherwise.
    That means that the type of the expression should be signed (otherwise -1
    could never appear), and on SPARC indeed it is defined as
     extern char leaf_reg_remap[];
     #define LEAF_REG_REMAP(REGNO) (leaf_reg_remap[REGNO])
    so unless the host is -funsigned-char by default it works fine.
    I guess sparc.[ch] should be fixed to use signed char of leaf_reg_remap,
    Eric?
    The argument to LEAF_REG_REMAP is often unsigned int though, hard
    register numbers are usually not negative, and thus the warning.
    I think xtensa doesn't have 2G hard registers and so it is ok to just cast
    it to int.
    
    2021-06-02  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR target/100841
            * config/xtensa/xtensa.h (LEAF_REG_REMAP): Cast REGNO to int to avoid
            -Wtype-limits warnings.
            (DWARF_FRAME_REGISTER): Rewrite into ternary operator with addition
            in operands to avoid -Wsign-compare warnings.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
index b01f6afe663..923ab5a6678 100644
--- a/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
+++ b/gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.h
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ extern const char xtensa_leaf_regs[FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER];
 
 /* For Xtensa, no remapping is necessary, but this macro must be
    defined if LEAF_REGISTERS is defined.  */
-#define LEAF_REG_REMAP(REGNO) (REGNO)
+#define LEAF_REG_REMAP(REGNO) ((int) (REGNO))
 
 /* This must be declared if LEAF_REGISTERS is set.  */
 extern int leaf_function;
@@ -775,8 +775,9 @@ typedef struct xtensa_args
 #define INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, 0)
 #define DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM (0)
 #define DWARF_ALT_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN 16
-#define DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS (DWARF_ALT_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN		\
-			       + (TARGET_WINDOWED_ABI ? 0 : 1))
+#define DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS (TARGET_WINDOWED_ABI \
+			       ? DWARF_ALT_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN		\
+			       : DWARF_ALT_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN + 1)
 #define EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO(N) ((N) < 2 ? (N) + 2 : INVALID_REGNUM)
 #define ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT(CODE, GLOBAL)			\
   (flag_pic								\


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-06-02 20:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-02 20:10 [gcc r12-1167] xtensa: Fix 2 warnings during xtensa build [PR100841] Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).