public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-1618] [Ada] Remove dead code for overlapping actuals in prefix notation
@ 2021-06-18  8:38 Pierre-Marie de Rodat
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat @ 2021-06-18  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c2886684f8263f5f63b15f358ce33bfc67d27ce

commit r12-1618-g9c2886684f8263f5f63b15f358ce33bfc67d27ce
Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 15 14:53:29 2021 +0100

    [Ada] Remove dead code for overlapping actuals in prefix notation
    
    gcc/ada/
    
            * sem_warn.adb (Warn_On_Overlapping_Actuals): Remove dead branch
            for overlapping actuals in prefix notation.

Diff:
---
 gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb | 42 ++++++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
index e85f4930175..d612d53dbea 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
@@ -3839,45 +3839,15 @@ package body Sem_Warn is
 
                        or else Error_To_Warning;
 
-                     --  If the call was written in prefix notation, and thus
-                     --  its prefix before rewriting was a selected component,
-                     --  count only visible actuals in call.
-
-                     if Is_Entity_Name (First_Actual (N))
-                       and then Nkind (Original_Node (N)) = Nkind (N)
-                       and then Nkind (Name (Original_Node (N))) =
-                                                     N_Selected_Component
-                       and then
-                         Is_Entity_Name (Prefix (Name (Original_Node (N))))
-                       and then
-                         Entity (Prefix (Name (Original_Node (N)))) =
-                           Entity (First_Actual (N))
-                     then
-                        if Act1 = First_Actual (N) then
-                           Error_Msg_FE
-                             ("<I<`IN OUT` prefix overlaps with "
-                              & "actual for&", Act1, Form2);
-
-                        else
-                           --  For greater clarity, give name of formal
-
-                           Error_Msg_Node_2 := Form2;
-                           Error_Msg_FE
-                             ("<I<writable actual for & overlaps with "
-                              & "actual for&", Act1, Form2);
-                        end if;
-
-                     else
-                        --  For greater clarity, give name of formal
+                     --  For greater clarity, give name of formal
 
-                        Error_Msg_Node_2 := Form2;
+                     Error_Msg_Node_2 := Form2;
 
-                        --  This is one of the messages
+                     --  This is one of the messages
 
-                        Error_Msg_FE
-                          ("<I<writable actual for & overlaps with "
-                           & "actual for&", Act1, Form1);
-                     end if;
+                     Error_Msg_FE
+                       ("<I<writable actual for & overlaps with actual for &",
+                        Act1, Form1);
                   end if;
                end if;
             end if;


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-06-18  8:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-18  8:38 [gcc r12-1618] [Ada] Remove dead code for overlapping actuals in prefix notation Pierre-Marie de Rodat

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).