public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-1696] inline-asm: Fix ICE with bitfields in "m" operands [PR100785]
@ 2021-06-21 11:33 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-06-21 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:644c2cc5f2c09506a7bfef293a7f90efa8d7e5fa

commit r12-1696-g644c2cc5f2c09506a7bfef293a7f90efa8d7e5fa
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Jun 21 13:30:42 2021 +0200

    inline-asm: Fix ICE with bitfields in "m" operands [PR100785]
    
    Bitfields, while they live in memory, aren't something inline-asm can easily
    operate on.
    For C and "=m" or "+m", we were diagnosing bitfields in the past in the
    FE, where c_mark_addressable had:
          case COMPONENT_REF:
            if (DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (TREE_OPERAND (x, 1)))
              {
                error
                  ("cannot take address of bit-field %qD", TREE_OPERAND (x, 1));
                return false;
              }
    but that check got moved in GCC 6 to build_unary_op instead and now we
    emit an error during expansion and ICE afterwards (i.e. error-recovery).
    For "m" it used to be diagnosed in c_mark_addressable too, but since
    GCC 6 it is ice-on-invalid.
    For C++, this was never diagnosed in the FE, but used to be diagnosed
    in the gimplifier and/or during expansion before 4.8.
    
    The following patch does multiple things:
    1) diagnoses it in the FEs
    2) stops emitting a redundant diagnostic in the gimplifier using the
       usual way, if we already see error_mark_node, we assume error has
       been emitted already and only diagnose if it wasn't error_mark_node;
       this helps diagnosing the same bug with multiple different
       errors
    3) simplifies during expansion the inline asm if any errors have been
       reported (similarly how e.g. vregs pass if it detects errors on
       inline-asm either deletes them or simplifies to bare minimum -
       just labels), so that we don't have error-recovery ICEs there
    
    2021-06-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR inline-asm/100785
    gcc/
            * gimplify.c (gimplify_asm_expr): Don't diagnose errors if
            output or input operands were already error_mark_node.
            * cfgexpand.c (expand_asm_stmt): If errors are emitted,
            remove all inputs, outputs and clobbers from the asm and
            set template to "".
    gcc/c/
            * c-typeck.c (c_mark_addressable): Diagnose trying to make
            bit-fields addressable.
    gcc/cp/
            * typeck.c (cxx_mark_addressable): Diagnose trying to make
            bit-fields addressable.
    gcc/testsuite/
            * c-c++-common/pr100785.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/pr48552-1.c: Don't expect invalid lvalue errors.
            * gcc.dg/pr48552-2.c: Likewise.

Diff:
---
 gcc/c/c-typeck.c                      | 11 ++++++++-
 gcc/cfgexpand.c                       | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 gcc/cp/typeck.c                       |  7 +++++-
 gcc/gimplify.c                        |  9 +++++---
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr100785.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-1.c      |  4 ++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-2.c      |  4 ++--
 7 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
index 845d50f3310..77de881c14a 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
@@ -5034,8 +5034,17 @@ c_mark_addressable (tree exp, bool array_ref_p)
 	    && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) == ARRAY_TYPE
 	    && VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (x, 0))))
 	  return true;
-	/* FALLTHRU */
+	x = TREE_OPERAND (x, 0);
+	break;
+
       case COMPONENT_REF:
+	if (DECL_C_BIT_FIELD (TREE_OPERAND (x, 1)))
+	  {
+	    error ("cannot take address of bit-field %qD",
+		   TREE_OPERAND (x, 1));
+	    return false;
+	  }
+	/* FALLTHRU */
       case ADDR_EXPR:
       case ARRAY_REF:
       case REALPART_EXPR:
diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index 39e5b040427..6394cfdcb56 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
@@ -3082,6 +3082,7 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
   unsigned ninputs = gimple_asm_ninputs (stmt);
   unsigned nlabels = gimple_asm_nlabels (stmt);
   unsigned i;
+  bool error_seen = false;
 
   /* ??? Diagnose during gimplification?  */
   if (ninputs + noutputs + nlabels > MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS)
@@ -3140,6 +3141,7 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
 		{
 		  /* ??? Diagnose during gimplification?  */
 		  error ("unknown register name %qs in %<asm%>", regname);
+		  error_seen = true;
 		}
 	      else if (j == -4)
 		{
@@ -3202,7 +3204,10 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
 		&& REG_P (DECL_RTL (output_tvec[j]))
 		&& HARD_REGISTER_P (DECL_RTL (output_tvec[j]))
 		&& output_hregno == REGNO (DECL_RTL (output_tvec[j])))
-	      error ("invalid hard register usage between output operands");
+	      {
+		error ("invalid hard register usage between output operands");
+		error_seen = true;
+	      }
 
 	  /* Verify matching constraint operands use the same hard register
 	     and that the non-matching constraint operands do not use the same
@@ -3225,13 +3230,19 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
 		  }
 		if (i == match
 		    && output_hregno != input_hregno)
-		  error ("invalid hard register usage between output operand "
-			 "and matching constraint operand");
+		  {
+		    error ("invalid hard register usage between output "
+			   "operand and matching constraint operand");
+		    error_seen = true;
+		  }
 		else if (early_clobber_p
 			 && i != match
 			 && output_hregno == input_hregno)
-		  error ("invalid hard register usage between earlyclobber "
-			 "operand and input operand");
+		  {
+		    error ("invalid hard register usage between "
+			   "earlyclobber operand and input operand");
+		    error_seen = true;
+		  }
 	      }
 	}
 
@@ -3307,7 +3318,10 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
 	    op = validize_mem (op);
 
 	  if (! allows_reg && !MEM_P (op))
-	    error ("output number %d not directly addressable", i);
+	    {
+	      error ("output number %d not directly addressable", i);
+	      error_seen = true;
+	    }
 	  if ((! allows_mem && MEM_P (op) && GET_MODE (op) != BLKmode)
 	      || GET_CODE (op) == CONCAT)
 	    {
@@ -3347,6 +3361,19 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
 	inout_opnum.safe_push (i);
     }
 
+  const char *str = gimple_asm_string (stmt);
+  if (error_seen)
+    {
+      ninputs = 0;
+      noutputs = 0;
+      inout_opnum.truncate (0);
+      output_rvec.truncate (0);
+      clobber_rvec.truncate (0);
+      constraints.truncate (0);
+      CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (clobbered_regs);
+      str = "";
+    }
+
   auto_vec<rtx, MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS> input_rvec;
   auto_vec<machine_mode, MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS> input_mode;
 
@@ -3405,7 +3432,7 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
     }
 
   /* For in-out operands, copy output rtx to input rtx.  */
-  unsigned ninout = inout_opnum.length();
+  unsigned ninout = inout_opnum.length ();
   for (i = 0; i < ninout; i++)
     {
       int j = inout_opnum[i];
@@ -3459,7 +3486,7 @@ expand_asm_stmt (gasm *stmt)
 
   rtx body = gen_rtx_ASM_OPERANDS ((noutputs == 0 ? VOIDmode
 				    : GET_MODE (output_rvec[0])),
-				   ggc_strdup (gimple_asm_string (stmt)),
+				   ggc_strdup (str),
 				   "", 0, argvec, constraintvec,
 				   labelvec, locus);
   MEM_VOLATILE_P (body) = gimple_asm_volatile_p (stmt);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index dbb2370510c..5a9331b36e6 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -7119,9 +7119,14 @@ cxx_mark_addressable (tree exp, bool array_ref_p)
 	    && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) == ARRAY_TYPE
 	    && VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (x, 0))))
 	  return true;
+	x = TREE_OPERAND (x, 0);
+	break;
+
+      case COMPONENT_REF:
+	if (bitfield_p (x))
+	  error ("attempt to take address of bit-field");
 	/* FALLTHRU */
       case ADDR_EXPR:
-      case COMPONENT_REF:
       case ARRAY_REF:
       case REALPART_EXPR:
       case IMAGPART_EXPR:
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.c b/gcc/gimplify.c
index 2606998152d..41bae9c188f 100644
--- a/gcc/gimplify.c
+++ b/gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -6323,12 +6323,14 @@ gimplify_asm_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, gimple_seq *post_p)
       if (!allows_reg && allows_mem)
 	mark_addressable (TREE_VALUE (link));
 
+      tree orig = TREE_VALUE (link);
       tret = gimplify_expr (&TREE_VALUE (link), pre_p, post_p,
 			    is_inout ? is_gimple_min_lval : is_gimple_lvalue,
 			    fb_lvalue | fb_mayfail);
       if (tret == GS_ERROR)
 	{
-	  error ("invalid lvalue in %<asm%> output %d", i);
+	  if (orig != error_mark_node)
+	    error ("invalid lvalue in %<asm%> output %d", i);
 	  ret = tret;
 	}
 
@@ -6523,8 +6525,9 @@ gimplify_asm_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, gimple_seq *post_p)
 	  mark_addressable (TREE_VALUE (link));
 	  if (tret == GS_ERROR)
 	    {
-	      error_at (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (TREE_VALUE (link), input_location),
-			"memory input %d is not directly addressable", i);
+	      if (inputv != error_mark_node)
+		error_at (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (TREE_VALUE (link), input_location),
+			  "memory input %d is not directly addressable", i);
 	      ret = tret;
 	    }
 	}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr100785.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr100785.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..37ff0aa8925
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr100785.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* PR inline-asm/100785 */
+
+struct S { int a : 1; };
+
+void
+foo (struct S *x)
+{
+  __asm__ ("" : "+m" (x->a));	/* { dg-error "address of bit-field" } */
+}
+
+void
+bar (struct S *x)
+{
+  __asm__ ("" : "=m" (x->a));	/* { dg-error "address of bit-field" } */
+}
+
+void
+baz (struct S *x)
+{
+  __asm__ ("" : : "m" (x->a));	/* { dg-error "address of bit-field" } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-1.c
index 11ee401e030..4cd7c59011e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-1.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ f2 (void *x)
 {
   __asm volatile ("" : "=r" (*x));	/* { dg-warning "dereferencing" "deref" } */
 }					/* { dg-error "invalid use of void expression" "void expr" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
-					/* { dg-error "invalid lvalue in 'asm' output 0" "invalid lvalue" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */
+
 void
 f3 (void *x)
 {
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ f6 (void *x)
 {
   __asm volatile ("" : "=g" (*x));	/* { dg-warning "dereferencing" "deref" } */
 }					/* { dg-error "invalid use of void expression" "void expr" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
-					/* { dg-error "invalid lvalue in 'asm' output 0" "invalid lvalue" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */
+
 void
 f7 (struct S *x)
 {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-2.c
index 2d2a00c43b7..e22600a2476 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48552-2.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ f2 (void *x)
 {
   __asm ("" : "=r" (*x));	/* { dg-warning "dereferencing" "deref" } */
 }				/* { dg-error "invalid use of void expression" "void expr" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
-				/* { dg-error "invalid lvalue in 'asm' output 0" "invalid lvalue" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */
+
 void
 f3 (void *x)
 {
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ f6 (void *x)
 {
   __asm ("" : "=g" (*x));	/* { dg-warning "dereferencing" "deref" } */
 }				/* { dg-error "invalid use of void expression" "void expr" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
-				/* { dg-error "invalid lvalue in 'asm' output 0" "invalid lvalue" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */
+
 void
 f7 (struct S *x)
 {


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-06-21 11:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-21 11:33 [gcc r12-1696] inline-asm: Fix ICE with bitfields in "m" operands [PR100785] Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).