public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-3312] match.pd: Demote IFN_{ADD, SUB, MUL}_OVERFLOW operands [PR99591]
@ 2021-09-02 9:26 Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-09-02 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2af6dd77ea742d4ee911f466878624972929508a
commit r12-3312-g2af6dd77ea742d4ee911f466878624972929508a
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Sep 2 11:25:07 2021 +0200
match.pd: Demote IFN_{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW operands [PR99591]
The overflow builtins work on infinite precision integers and then convert
to the result type's precision, so any argument promotions are useless.
The expand_arith_overflow expansion is able to demote the arguments itself
through get_range_pos_neg and get_min_precision calls and if needed promote
to whatever mode it decides to perform the operations in, but if there are
any promotions it demoted, those are already expanded. Normally combine
would remove the useless sign or zero extensions when it sees the result
of those is only used in a lowpart subreg, but typically those lowpart
subregs appear multiple times in the pattern so that they describe properly
the overflow behavior and combine gives up, so we end up with e.g.
movswl %si, %esi
movswl %di, %edi
imulw %si, %di
seto %al
where both movswl insns are useless.
The following patch fixes it by demoting operands of the ifns (only gets
rid of integral to integral conversions that increase precision).
While IFN_{ADD,MUL}_OVERFLOW are commutative and just one simplify would be
enough, IFN_SUB_OVERFLOW is not, therefore two simplifications.
2021-09-02 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/99591
* match.pd: Demote operands of IFN_{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW if they
were promoted.
* gcc.target/i386/pr99591.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/pr97950.c: Match or reject setb or jn?b instructions
together with seta or jn?a.
Diff:
---
gcc/match.pd | 15 +++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97950.c | 4 ++--
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr99591.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index f421c74b62c..f920bc4b7c1 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -5587,6 +5587,21 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
(with { tree t = TREE_TYPE (@0), cpx = build_complex_type (t); }
(cmp (imagpart (IFN_MUL_OVERFLOW:cpx @0 @1)) { build_zero_cst (t); })))))
+/* Demote operands of IFN_{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW. */
+(for ovf (IFN_ADD_OVERFLOW IFN_SUB_OVERFLOW IFN_MUL_OVERFLOW)
+ (simplify
+ (ovf (convert@2 @0) @1)
+ (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@2))
+ && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@2)) > TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+ (ovf @0 @1)))
+ (simplify
+ (ovf @1 (convert@2 @0))
+ (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@2))
+ && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@2)) > TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+ (ovf @1 @0))))
+
/* Simplification of math builtins. These rules must all be optimizations
as well as IL simplifications. If there is a possibility that the new
form could be a pessimization, the rule should go in the canonicalization
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97950.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97950.c
index 277311d9a4e..185d73378cb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97950.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97950.c
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
/* PR target/95950 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -mtune=generic" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tseta\t" 4 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tset\[ab]\t" 4 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tseto\t" 16 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tsetc\t" 4 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tjn?a\t" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tjn?\[ab]\t" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tjn?o\t" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tjn?c\t" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr99591.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr99591.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..01d84858401
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr99591.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/99591 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tmovs\[bw]l\t" } } */
+
+int
+foo (signed char a, signed char b)
+{
+ signed char r;
+ return __builtin_add_overflow (a, b, &r);
+}
+
+int
+bar (short a, short b)
+{
+ short r;
+ return __builtin_add_overflow (a, b, &r);
+}
+
+int
+baz (signed char a, signed char b)
+{
+ signed char r;
+ return __builtin_add_overflow ((int) a, (int) b, &r);
+}
+
+int
+qux (short a, short b)
+{
+ short r;
+ return __builtin_add_overflow ((int) a, (int) b, &r);
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-09-02 9:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-02 9:26 [gcc r12-3312] match.pd: Demote IFN_{ADD, SUB, MUL}_OVERFLOW operands [PR99591] Jakub Jelinek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).