public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-5629] Add comment to indicate tail recursion
@ 2021-11-30 14:27 Richard Biener
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2021-11-30 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26493af58a1297d5d9fbb061694416deaee71220
commit r12-5629-g26493af58a1297d5d9fbb061694416deaee71220
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Tue Nov 30 15:25:17 2021 +0100
Add comment to indicate tail recursion
My previous change removed an unreachable break; there (an
unreachable continue; would have been more to the point). The
following re-adds a comment explaining that WALK_SUBEXPR_TAIL
does not fall through but tail recurses.
2021-11-30 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
gcc/fortran/
* frontend-passes.c (gfc_expr_walker): Add comment to
indicate tail recursion.
Diff:
---
gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
index 16ee2afc9c0..4764c834f4f 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
@@ -5229,6 +5229,7 @@ gfc_expr_walker (gfc_expr **e, walk_expr_fn_t exprfn, void *data)
case EXPR_OP:
WALK_SUBEXPR ((*e)->value.op.op1);
WALK_SUBEXPR_TAIL ((*e)->value.op.op2);
+ /* No fallthru because of the tail recursion above. */
case EXPR_FUNCTION:
for (a = (*e)->value.function.actual; a; a = a->next)
WALK_SUBEXPR (a->expr);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-11-30 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-30 14:27 [gcc r12-5629] Add comment to indicate tail recursion Richard Biener
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).