public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-6425] c++: constexpr base-to-derived conversion with offset 0 [PR103879]
@ 2022-01-10 19:59 Patrick Palka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2022-01-10 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab36b554bd90e8db279d13b133369118814f13fb

commit r12-6425-gab36b554bd90e8db279d13b133369118814f13fb
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Jan 10 14:57:54 2022 -0500

    c++: constexpr base-to-derived conversion with offset 0 [PR103879]
    
    r12-136 made us canonicalize an object/offset pair with negative offset
    into one with a nonnegative offset, by iteratively absorbing the
    innermost component into the offset and stopping as soon as the offset
    becomes nonnegative.
    
    This patch strengthens this transformation by making it keep on absorbing
    even if the offset is already 0 as long as the innermost component is at
    position 0 (and thus absorbing doesn't change the offset).  This lets us
    accept the two constexpr testcases below, which we'd previously reject
    essentially because cxx_fold_indirect_ref would be unable to resolve
    *(B*)&b.D123 (where D123 is the base A subobject at position 0) to just b.
    
            PR c++/103879
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * constexpr.c (cxx_fold_indirect_ref): Split out object/offset
            canonicalization step into a local lambda.  Strengthen it to
            absorb more components at position 0.  Use it before both calls
            to cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2a.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.c                            | 38 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2.C  | 15 +++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2a.C | 17 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index af6a4a729e9..d0da4a70448 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -5215,6 +5215,25 @@ cxx_fold_indirect_ref (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, location_t loc, tree type,
   if (!INDIRECT_TYPE_P (subtype))
     return NULL_TREE;
 
+  /* Canonicalizes the given OBJ/OFF pair by iteratively absorbing
+     the innermost component into the offset until it would make the
+     offset positive, so that cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1 can identify
+     more folding opportunities.  */
+  auto canonicalize_obj_off = [] (tree& obj, tree& off) {
+    while (TREE_CODE (obj) == COMPONENT_REF
+	   && (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (off) || integer_zerop (off)))
+      {
+	tree field = TREE_OPERAND (obj, 1);
+	tree pos = byte_position (field);
+	if (integer_zerop (off) && integer_nonzerop (pos))
+	  /* If the offset is already 0, keep going as long as the
+	     component is at position 0.  */
+	  break;
+	off = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, off, pos);
+	obj = TREE_OPERAND (obj, 0);
+      }
+  };
+
   if (TREE_CODE (sub) == ADDR_EXPR)
     {
       tree op = TREE_OPERAND (sub, 0);
@@ -5233,7 +5252,12 @@ cxx_fold_indirect_ref (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, location_t loc, tree type,
 	    return op;
 	}
       else
-	return cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1 (ctx, loc, type, op, 0, empty_base);
+	{
+	  tree off = integer_zero_node;
+	  canonicalize_obj_off (op, off);
+	  gcc_assert (integer_zerop (off));
+	  return cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1 (ctx, loc, type, op, 0, empty_base);
+	}
     }
   else if (TREE_CODE (sub) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
 	   && tree_fits_uhwi_p (TREE_OPERAND (sub, 1)))
@@ -5245,17 +5269,7 @@ cxx_fold_indirect_ref (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, location_t loc, tree type,
       if (TREE_CODE (op00) == ADDR_EXPR)
 	{
 	  tree obj = TREE_OPERAND (op00, 0);
-	  while (TREE_CODE (obj) == COMPONENT_REF
-		 && tree_int_cst_sign_bit (off))
-	    {
-	      /* Canonicalize this object/offset pair by iteratively absorbing
-		 the innermost component into the offset until the offset is
-		 nonnegative, so that cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1 can identify
-		 more folding opportunities.  */
-	      tree field = TREE_OPERAND (obj, 1);
-	      off = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, off, byte_position (field));
-	      obj = TREE_OPERAND (obj, 0);
-	    }
+	  canonicalize_obj_off (obj, off);
 	  return cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1 (ctx, loc, type, obj,
 					  tree_to_uhwi (off), empty_base);
 	}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a267c14bc80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/103879
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct A { int n = 42; };
+struct B : A { };
+struct C { B b; };
+
+constexpr int f() {
+  C c;
+  A& a = static_cast<A&>(c.b);
+  B& b = static_cast<B&>(a);
+  return b.n;
+}
+
+static_assert(f() == 42, "");
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2a.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9eb72b96de9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base2a.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/103879
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct A { int n = 42; };
+struct Y { int m = 0; };
+struct X : Y, A { };
+struct B : X { };
+struct C { B b; };
+
+constexpr int f() {
+  C c;
+  A& a = static_cast<A&>(c.b);
+  B& b = static_cast<B&>(a);
+  return b.n;
+}
+
+static_assert(f() == 42, "");


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-01-10 19:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-10 19:59 [gcc r12-6425] c++: constexpr base-to-derived conversion with offset 0 [PR103879] Patrick Palka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).