public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-6990] cris: Don't discriminate against ALL_REGS in TARGET_REGISTER_MOVE_COST
@ 2022-02-02 0:20 Hans-Peter Nilsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2022-02-02 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a7f14ef9b6b287d99b8240cdb43e8fe089ea9b3
commit r12-6990-g9a7f14ef9b6b287d99b8240cdb43e8fe089ea9b3
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
Date: Wed Feb 2 00:00:10 2022 +0100
cris: Don't discriminate against ALL_REGS in TARGET_REGISTER_MOVE_COST
When the tightest class including both SPECIAL_REGS and GENERAL_REGS
is ALL_REGS, artificially special-casing for *either* to or from, hits
artificially hard. This gets the port back to the code quality before
the previous patch ("cris: Remove CRIS v32 ACR artefacts") - except
for_vfprintf_r and _vfiprintf_r in newlib (still .8 and .4% larger).
gcc:
* config/cris/cris.cc (cris_register_move_cost): Remove special pre-ira
extra cost for ALL_REGS.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/cris/cris.cc | 18 ++++--------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc b/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc
index 264439c7654..4f977221f45 100644
--- a/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/cris/cris.cc
@@ -1683,20 +1683,10 @@ cris_register_move_cost (machine_mode mode ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
their move cost within that class is higher. How about 7? That's 3
for a move to a GENERAL_REGS register, 3 for the move from the
GENERAL_REGS register, and 1 for the increased register pressure.
- Also, it's higher than the memory move cost, as it should.
- We also do this for ALL_REGS, since we don't want that class to be
- preferred (even to memory) at all where GENERAL_REGS doesn't fit.
- Whenever it's about to be used, it's for SPECIAL_REGS. If we don't
- present a higher cost for ALL_REGS than memory, a SPECIAL_REGS may be
- used when a GENERAL_REGS should be used, even if there are call-saved
- GENERAL_REGS left to allocate. This is because the fall-back when
- the most preferred register class isn't available, isn't the next
- (or next good) wider register class, but the *most widest* register
- class. FIXME: pre-IRA comment, perhaps obsolete now. */
-
- if ((reg_classes_intersect_p (from, SPECIAL_REGS)
- && reg_classes_intersect_p (to, SPECIAL_REGS))
- || from == ALL_REGS || to == ALL_REGS)
+ Also, it's higher than the memory move cost, as it should be. */
+
+ if (reg_classes_intersect_p (from, SPECIAL_REGS)
+ && reg_classes_intersect_p (to, SPECIAL_REGS))
return 7;
/* Make moves to/from SPECIAL_REGS slightly more expensive, as we
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-02-02 0:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-02 0:20 [gcc r12-6990] cris: Don't discriminate against ALL_REGS in TARGET_REGISTER_MOVE_COST Hans-Peter Nilsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).