[gcc r12-7523] doc: Remove redundant sentence about modules being in C++20

[gcc r12-7523] doc: Remove redundant sentence about modules being in C++20

[Jonathan Wakely]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a86ca83a1b1817457837540e0bc8dd26db75407c

commit r12-7523-ga86ca83a1b1817457837540e0bc8dd26db75407c
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 7 16:08:10 2022 +0000

    doc: Remove redundant sentence about modules being in C++20
    
    As C++20 has already been published, we don't need to link to the draft
    (which is now the C++23 draft anyway). And there's no need to say it's
    part of the C++20 spec, or that there might be defect reports. That's
    true for everything in C++20, so calling it out here just for Modules
    isn't needed.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * doc/invoke.texi (C++ Modules): Remove anachronism.

Diff:
---
 gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 248ed534aee..b01ffab566a 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -34151,9 +34151,7 @@ provides a modular compilation system, intending to provide both
 faster builds and better library isolation.  The ``Merging Modules''
 paper @uref{https://wg21.link/p1103}, provides the easiest to read set
 of changes to the standard, although it does not capture later
-changes.  That specification is now part of C++20,
-@uref{git@@github.com:cplusplus/draft.git}, it is considered complete
-(there may be defect reports to come).
+changes.
 
 @emph{G++'s modules support is not complete.}  Other than bugs, the
 known missing pieces are: