public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc(refs/vendors/ARM/heads/morello)] Fix loss of CAP_ADDR_EXPR when using build_fold_addr_expr
@ 2022-05-06 14:44 Matthew Malcomson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matthew Malcomson @ 2022-05-06 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa8f65853fdc4454e32c9adb8692dc6e0d527e85
commit aa8f65853fdc4454e32c9adb8692dc6e0d527e85
Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date: Thu Apr 21 11:45:04 2022 +0100
Fix loss of CAP_ADDR_EXPR when using build_fold_addr_expr
This patch fixes another case in which code looks through an
ADDR_EXPR and creates a new one based on the underlying base.
The new ADDR_EXPR must be the same tree_code as the old one.
Diff:
---
gcc/fold-const.c | 11 ++++++++
gcc/fold-const.h | 13 ++++++++--
gcc/gimple-laddress.c | 3 ++-
.../gcc.target/aarch64/morello/pointer-arith-5.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c
index e848b4c00b2..5f1db095cf6 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -8764,6 +8764,17 @@ build_fold_addr_expr_loc (location_t loc, tree t)
return build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc (loc, t, ptrtype);
}
+/* Build an expression for the address of T, calculated by *ADDR_EXPR
+ code ADDR_EXPR. */
+
+tree
+build_fold_addr_expr_loc (location_t loc, tree_code addr_expr, tree t)
+{
+ tree ptrtype = addr_expr_type (addr_expr, TREE_TYPE (t));
+
+ return build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc (loc, t, ptrtype);
+}
+
/* Fold a unary expression of code CODE and type TYPE with operand
OP0. Return the folded expression if folding is successful.
Otherwise, return NULL_TREE. */
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.h b/gcc/fold-const.h
index 4406c74056e..738e2d0fc51 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.h
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.h
@@ -122,9 +122,18 @@ extern bool wide_int_binop (wide_int &res, enum tree_code,
const wide_int &arg1, const wide_int &arg2,
signop, wi::overflow_type *);
extern tree int_const_binop (enum tree_code, const_tree, const_tree, int = 1);
-#define build_fold_addr_expr(T)\
- build_fold_addr_expr_loc (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, (T))
extern tree build_fold_addr_expr_loc (location_t, tree);
+inline tree
+build_fold_addr_expr (tree op)
+{
+ return build_fold_addr_expr_loc (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, op);
+}
+extern tree build_fold_addr_expr_loc (location_t, tree_code, tree);
+inline tree
+build_fold_addr_expr (tree_code addr_expr, tree op)
+{
+ return build_fold_addr_expr_loc (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, addr_expr, op);
+}
#define build_fold_addr_expr_with_type(T,TYPE)\
build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, (T), TYPE)
extern tree build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc (location_t, tree, tree);
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-laddress.c b/gcc/gimple-laddress.c
index 9a8d11c7637..4660b64abd6 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-laddress.c
+++ b/gcc/gimple-laddress.c
@@ -110,11 +110,12 @@ pass_laddress::execute (function *fun)
poly_int64 bytepos = exact_div (bitpos, BITS_PER_UNIT);
if (offset != NULL_TREE)
{
+ tree_code addr_expr = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
if (maybe_ne (bytepos, 0))
offset = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, offset, size_int (bytepos));
offset = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, offset, true, NULL,
true, GSI_SAME_STMT);
- base = build_fold_addr_expr (base);
+ base = build_fold_addr_expr (addr_expr, base);
base = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, base, true, NULL,
true, GSI_SAME_STMT);
gimple *g = gimple_build_assign (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt),
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/morello/pointer-arith-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/morello/pointer-arith-5.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4c331376e1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/morello/pointer-arith-5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+struct GTeth_desc
+{
+ unsigned ed_cmdsts;
+};
+struct GTeth_softc
+{
+ struct GTeth_desc txq_desc[32];
+ unsigned int txq_fi;
+ unsigned int txq_nactive;
+};
+
+void GTeth_txq_free (struct GTeth_softc *sc);
+
+void
+GTeth_txq_done (struct GTeth_softc *__capability sc)
+{
+ while (sc->txq_nactive > 0)
+ {
+ volatile struct GTeth_desc *txd
+ = (volatile struct GTeth_desc *) &sc->txq_desc[sc->txq_fi];
+ if (txd->ed_cmdsts)
+ {
+ if (sc->txq_nactive == 1)
+ return;
+ }
+ GTeth_txq_free (sc);
+ }
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-05-06 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-06 14:44 [gcc(refs/vendors/ARM/heads/morello)] Fix loss of CAP_ADDR_EXPR when using build_fold_addr_expr Matthew Malcomson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).