public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat <pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc r13-847] [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 08:31:43 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220530083143.D752138560B9@sourceware.org> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e commit r13-847-g0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com> Date: Fri Apr 8 23:27:24 2022 +0200 [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses The GNAT behaviour regarding the Ada RM requirement to support Address clauses for imported subprograms was documented twice: in section about packed types (which was a mistake) and in section about address clauses (where it belongs). Cleanup related to the use of packed arrays for bitset operations to detect uses of uninitialized scalars in GNAT. gcc/ada/ * doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst (Packed Types): Remove duplicated and wrongly placed paragraph. * gnat_rm.texi: Regenerate. Diff: --- gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst | 6 ------ gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi | 8 -------- 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst index e7649b09387..f2f34db6835 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst +++ b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst @@ -353,12 +353,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a subcomponent of the packed type. - - "An implementation should support Address clauses for imported - subprograms." - -Followed. - .. index:: Address clauses RM 13.3(14-19): Address Clauses diff --git a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi index 434bd3c8e61..1fa93a36a40 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi +++ b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi @@ -14333,14 +14333,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a subcomponent of the packed type. -@quotation - -“An implementation should support Address clauses for imported -subprograms.” -@end quotation - -Followed. - @geindex Address clauses @node RM 13 3 14-19 Address Clauses,RM 13 3 29-35 Alignment Clauses,RM 13 2 6-8 Packed Types,Implementation Advice
reply other threads:[~2022-05-30 8:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220530083143.D752138560B9@sourceware.org \ --to=pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).