public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat <pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r13-847] [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 08:31:43 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220530083143.D752138560B9@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e

commit r13-847-g0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e
Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 8 23:27:24 2022 +0200

    [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses
    
    The GNAT behaviour regarding the Ada RM requirement to support Address
    clauses for imported subprograms was documented twice: in section about
    packed types (which was a mistake) and in section about address clauses
    (where it belongs).
    
    Cleanup related to the use of packed arrays for bitset operations to
    detect uses of uninitialized scalars in GNAT.
    
    gcc/ada/
    
            * doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst (Packed Types): Remove
            duplicated and wrongly placed paragraph.
            * gnat_rm.texi: Regenerate.

Diff:
---
 gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst | 6 ------
 gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi                          | 8 --------
 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
index e7649b09387..f2f34db6835 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
+++ b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
@@ -353,12 +353,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
 happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
 subcomponent of the packed type.
 
-
-  "An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
-  subprograms."
-
-Followed.
-
 .. index:: Address clauses
 
 RM 13.3(14-19): Address Clauses
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
index 434bd3c8e61..1fa93a36a40 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
+++ b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
@@ -14333,14 +14333,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
 happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
 subcomponent of the packed type.
 
-@quotation
-
-“An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
-subprograms.”
-@end quotation
-
-Followed.
-
 @geindex Address clauses
 
 @node RM 13 3 14-19 Address Clauses,RM 13 3 29-35 Alignment Clauses,RM 13 2 6-8 Packed Types,Implementation Advice


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-05-30  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220530083143.D752138560B9@sourceware.org \
    --to=pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).