public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r13-847] [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses
@ 2022-05-30 8:31 Pierre-Marie de Rodat
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat @ 2022-05-30 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e
commit r13-847-g0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e
Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com>
Date: Fri Apr 8 23:27:24 2022 +0200
[Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses
The GNAT behaviour regarding the Ada RM requirement to support Address
clauses for imported subprograms was documented twice: in section about
packed types (which was a mistake) and in section about address clauses
(where it belongs).
Cleanup related to the use of packed arrays for bitset operations to
detect uses of uninitialized scalars in GNAT.
gcc/ada/
* doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst (Packed Types): Remove
duplicated and wrongly placed paragraph.
* gnat_rm.texi: Regenerate.
Diff:
---
gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst | 6 ------
gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi | 8 --------
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
index e7649b09387..f2f34db6835 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
+++ b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
@@ -353,12 +353,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
subcomponent of the packed type.
-
- "An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
- subprograms."
-
-Followed.
-
.. index:: Address clauses
RM 13.3(14-19): Address Clauses
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
index 434bd3c8e61..1fa93a36a40 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
+++ b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
@@ -14333,14 +14333,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
subcomponent of the packed type.
-@quotation
-
-“An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
-subprograms.”
-@end quotation
-
-Followed.
-
@geindex Address clauses
@node RM 13 3 14-19 Address Clauses,RM 13 3 29-35 Alignment Clauses,RM 13 2 6-8 Packed Types,Implementation Advice
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-05-30 8:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-30 8:31 [gcc r13-847] [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses Pierre-Marie de Rodat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).