public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r13-847] [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses
@ 2022-05-30  8:31 Pierre-Marie de Rodat
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat @ 2022-05-30  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e

commit r13-847-g0f29dfcec26d883cb2d3d7ccdfc09bde1afcfa2e
Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 8 23:27:24 2022 +0200

    [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses
    
    The GNAT behaviour regarding the Ada RM requirement to support Address
    clauses for imported subprograms was documented twice: in section about
    packed types (which was a mistake) and in section about address clauses
    (where it belongs).
    
    Cleanup related to the use of packed arrays for bitset operations to
    detect uses of uninitialized scalars in GNAT.
    
    gcc/ada/
    
            * doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst (Packed Types): Remove
            duplicated and wrongly placed paragraph.
            * gnat_rm.texi: Regenerate.

Diff:
---
 gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst | 6 ------
 gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi                          | 8 --------
 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
index e7649b09387..f2f34db6835 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
+++ b/gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
@@ -353,12 +353,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
 happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
 subcomponent of the packed type.
 
-
-  "An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
-  subprograms."
-
-Followed.
-
 .. index:: Address clauses
 
 RM 13.3(14-19): Address Clauses
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
index 434bd3c8e61..1fa93a36a40 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
+++ b/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
@@ -14333,14 +14333,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
 happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
 subcomponent of the packed type.
 
-@quotation
-
-“An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
-subprograms.”
-@end quotation
-
-Followed.
-
 @geindex Address clauses
 
 @node RM 13 3 14-19 Address Clauses,RM 13 3 29-35 Alignment Clauses,RM 13 2 6-8 Packed Types,Implementation Advice


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-05-30  8:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-30  8:31 [gcc r13-847] [Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses Pierre-Marie de Rodat

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).