[gcc r13-1552] testsuite: Fix incorrect -mfloat128-type option

[gcc r13-1552] testsuite: Fix incorrect -mfloat128-type option

[Jonathan Wakely]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1b1c4e58bda152ae932b45396ab67b07dd8c3fe

commit r13-1552-gc1b1c4e58bda152ae932b45396ab67b07dd8c3fe
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 6 19:11:05 2022 +0100

    testsuite: Fix incorrect -mfloat128-type option
    
    This test currently fails with an error about -mfloat128-type being an
    invalid option, which is not what it's supposed to be testing:
    
    XFAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
    Excess errors:
    xgcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mfloat128-type'; did you mean '-mfloat128'?
    
    With this change we get the error that the comment says it expects:
    
    XFAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
    Excess errors:
    f951: Error: power9 target option is incompatible with '-mcpu=<xxx>' for <xxx> less than power9
    f951: Error: '-mfloat128' requires VSX support
    f951: Error: '-m64' requires a PowerPC64 cpu
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90: Change
            -mfloat128-type to -mfloat128.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90 | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90
index 844166d55e3..dac5c361689 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-fortran/pr80108-1.f90
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ! Originally contributed by Tobias Burnas.
 ! { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } }
 ! { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok }
-! { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=405 -mpower9-minmax -mfloat128-type" }
+! { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=405 -mpower9-minmax -mfloat128" }
 ! { dg-excess-errors "expect error due to conflicting target options" }
 ! Since the error message is not associated with a particular line
 ! number, we cannot use the dg-error directive and cannot specify a