public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r12-8643] wide-int: Fix up wi::shifted_mask [PR106144]
@ 2022-07-30  9:34 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2022-07-30  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:527dccb33e54ffe49fb1507fc4539968f48a9d12

commit r12-8643-g527dccb33e54ffe49fb1507fc4539968f48a9d12
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 1 11:17:41 2022 +0200

    wide-int: Fix up wi::shifted_mask [PR106144]
    
    As the following self-test testcase shows, wi::shifted_mask sometimes
    doesn't create canonicalized wide_ints, which then fail to compare equal
    to canonicalized wide_ints with the same value.
    In particular, wi::mask (128, false, 128) gives { -1 } with len 1 and prec 128,
    while wi::shifted_mask (0, 128, false, 128) gives { -1, -1 } with len 2
    and prec 128.
    The problem is that the code is written with the assumption that there are
    3 bit blocks (or 2 if start is 0), but doesn't consider the possibility
    where there are 2 bit blocks (or 1 if start is 0) where the highest block
    isn't present.  In that case, there is the optional block of negate ? 0 : -1
    elts, followed by just one elt (either one from the if (shift) or just
    negate ? -1 : 0) and the rest is implicit sign-extension.
    Only if end < prec there is 1 or more bits above it that have different bit
    value and so we need to emit all the elts till end and then one more elt.
    
    if (end == prec) would work too, because we have:
      if (width > prec - start)
        width = prec - start;
      unsigned int end = start + width;
    so end is guaranteed to be end <= prec, dunno what is preferred.
    
    2022-07-01  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR middle-end/106144
            * wide-int.cc (wi::shifted_mask): If end >= prec, return right after
            emitting element for shift or if shift is 0 first element after start.
            (wide_int_cc_tests): Add tests for equivalency of wi::mask and
            wi::shifted_mask with 0 start.
    
    (cherry picked from commit e52592073f6df3d7a3acd9f0436dcc32a8b7493d)

Diff:
---
 gcc/wide-int.cc | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/wide-int.cc b/gcc/wide-int.cc
index f61b9fefc13..1fee0788554 100644
--- a/gcc/wide-int.cc
+++ b/gcc/wide-int.cc
@@ -842,6 +842,13 @@ wi::shifted_mask (HOST_WIDE_INT *val, unsigned int start, unsigned int width,
 	val[i++] = negate ? block : ~block;
     }
 
+  if (end >= prec)
+    {
+      if (!shift)
+	val[i++] = negate ? 0 : -1;
+      return i;
+    }
+
   while (i < end / HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
     /* 1111111 */
     val[i++] = negate ? 0 : -1;
@@ -853,7 +860,7 @@ wi::shifted_mask (HOST_WIDE_INT *val, unsigned int start, unsigned int width,
       HOST_WIDE_INT block = (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << shift) - 1;
       val[i++] = negate ? ~block : block;
     }
-  else if (end < prec)
+  else
     val[i++] = negate ? -1 : 0;
 
   return i;
@@ -2583,6 +2590,10 @@ wide_int_cc_tests ()
   run_all_wide_int_tests <widest_int> ();
   test_overflow ();
   test_round_for_mask ();
+  ASSERT_EQ (wi::mask (128, false, 128),
+	     wi::shifted_mask (0, 128, false, 128));
+  ASSERT_EQ (wi::mask (128, true, 128),
+	     wi::shifted_mask (0, 128, true, 128));
 }
 
 } // namespace selftest


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-07-30  9:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-30  9:34 [gcc r12-8643] wide-int: Fix up wi::shifted_mask [PR106144] Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).