public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r13-2282] vect: Tighten get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type
@ 2022-08-30 14:44 Richard Sandiford
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Richard Sandiford @ 2022-08-30 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25c2a50cc343eb7c2500b69a6556551d5221393f

commit r13-2282-g25c2a50cc343eb7c2500b69a6556551d5221393f
Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 30 15:43:45 2022 +0100

    vect: Tighten get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type
    
    Builds of glibc with SVE enabled have been failing since V1DI was added
    to the aarch64 port.  The problem is that BB SLP starts the (hopeless)
    attempt to use variable-length modes to vectorise a single-element
    vector, and that now gets further than it did before.
    
    Initially we tried getting a vector mode with 1 + 1X DI elements
    (i.e. 1 DI per 128-bit vector chunk).  We don't provide such a mode --
    it would be VNx1DI -- because it isn't a native SVE format.  We then
    try just 1 DI, which previously failed but now succeeds.
    
    There are numerous ways we could fix this.  Perhaps the most obvious
    would be to skip variable-length modes for BB SLP.  However, I think
    that'd just be kicking the can down the road, since eventually we want
    to support BB SLP and VLA vectors using predication.
    
    However, if we do use VLA vectors for BB SLP, the vector modes
    we use should actually be variable length.  We don't want to use
    variable-length vectors for some element types/group sizes and
    fixed-length vectors for others, since it would be difficult
    to handle the seams.
    
    The same principle applies during loop vectorisation.  We can't
    use a mixture of variable-length and fixed-length vectors for
    the same loop because the relative unroll/vectorisation factors
    would not be constant (compile-time) multiples of each other.
    
    This patch therefore makes get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type
    check that the provided number of units is interoperable with
    the provided prevailing mode.  The function is generally quite
    forgiving -- it does basic things like checking for scalarness
    itself rather than expecting callers to do them -- so the new
    check feels in keeping with that.
    
    This seems to subsume the fix for PR96974.  I'm not sure it's
    worth reverting that code to an assert though, so the patch just
    drops the scan for the associated message.
    
    gcc/
            * tree-vect-stmts.cc (get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type): Check
            that the requested number of units is interoperable with the requested
            prevailing mode.
    
    gcc/testsuite/
            * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_15.c: New test.
            * g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr96974.C: Remove scan test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr96974.C |  4 +---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_15.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc                         | 10 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr96974.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr96974.C
index 54000f568ab..2f6ebd6ce3d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr96974.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr96974.C
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve -fdisable-tree-fre4 -fdump-tree-slp-details" } */
+/* { dg-options "-Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve -fdisable-tree-fre4" } */
 
 float a;
 int
@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ struct c {
     }
     int coeffs[10];
 } f;
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Not vectorized: Incompatible number of vector subparts between" "slp1" { target lp64 } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_15.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_15.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..23f6d567cc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/slp_15.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */
+
+struct foo
+{
+  void *handle;
+  void *arg;
+};
+
+void
+dlinfo_doit (struct foo *args)
+{
+  __UINTPTR_TYPE__ **l = args->handle;
+
+  *(__UINTPTR_TYPE__ *) args->arg = 0;
+  *(__UINTPTR_TYPE__ *) args->arg = **l;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
index c9dab217f05..7748c42c70f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
@@ -11486,6 +11486,16 @@ get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type (machine_mode prevailing_mode,
 
   unsigned int nbytes = GET_MODE_SIZE (inner_mode);
 
+  /* Interoperability between modes requires one to be a constant multiple
+     of the other, so that the number of vectors required for each operation
+     is a compile-time constant.  */
+  if (prevailing_mode != VOIDmode
+      && !constant_multiple_p (nunits * nbytes,
+			       GET_MODE_SIZE (prevailing_mode))
+      && !constant_multiple_p (GET_MODE_SIZE (prevailing_mode),
+			       nunits * nbytes))
+    return NULL_TREE;
+
   /* For vector types of elements whose mode precision doesn't
      match their types precision we use a element type of mode
      precision.  The vectorization routines will have to make sure

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-08-30 14:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-30 14:44 [gcc r13-2282] vect: Tighten get_related_vectype_for_scalar_type Richard Sandiford

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).