public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc(refs/users/marxin/heads/PR107551)] i386: fix assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >= 0)
@ 2022-11-25 12:10 Martin Liska
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Liska @ 2022-11-25 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d1075d4935c2592bd179e886c0b92a383b8ee01

commit 3d1075d4935c2592bd179e886c0b92a383b8ee01
Author: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri Nov 25 13:05:56 2022 +0100

    i386: fix assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >= 0)
    
    Similar story as PR103661, we again return a negative number
    for __builtin_cpu_supports:
    
    Documentation says:
    
    int __builtin_cpu_supports(const char *feature)
    This function returns a positive integer if the run-time CPU supports feature and returns 0 otherwise.
    while we return -2147483648.
    
    Moreover, I noticed "x86-64" is not a valid option for __builtin_cpu_is,
    but for __builtin_cpu_supports.
    
    PR target/107551
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/i386/i386-builtins.cc (fold_builtin_cpu): Use same path
            as for PR103661.
            * doc/extend.texi: Fix "x86-64" use.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c: Add more checks.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.cc               | 25 +++++++++++--------------
 gcc/doc/extend.texi                            | 22 ++++++++++------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.cc
index eacdf072244..c57c1380298 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.cc
@@ -2181,18 +2181,14 @@ fold_builtin_cpu (tree fndecl, tree *args)
 	      varpool_node::add (ix86_cpu_features2_var);
 	    }
 
+	  /* Skip __cpu_features[0].  */
 	  feature -= INT_TYPE_SIZE;
-	  field_val = 1U << (feature % INT_TYPE_SIZE);
 	  tree index = size_int (feature / INT_TYPE_SIZE);
+	  feature = feature % INT_TYPE_SIZE;
 	  array_elt = build4 (ARRAY_REF, unsigned_type_node,
 			      ix86_cpu_features2_var,
 			      index, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
 	  /* Return __cpu_features2[index] & field_val  */
-	  final = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,
-			  array_elt,
-			  build_int_cstu (unsigned_type_node,
-					  field_val));
-	  return build1 (NOP_EXPR, integer_type_node, final);
 	}
       else
 	{
@@ -2209,16 +2205,17 @@ fold_builtin_cpu (tree fndecl, tree *args)
 	  array_elt = build4 (ARRAY_REF, unsigned_type_node, ref,
 			      integer_zero_node, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
 
-	  field_val = (1U << feature);
 	  /* Return __cpu_model.__cpu_features[0] & field_val  */
-	  final = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, array_elt,
-			  build_int_cstu (unsigned_type_node, field_val));
-	  if (feature == (INT_TYPE_SIZE - 1))
-	    return build2 (NE_EXPR, integer_type_node, final,
-			   build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, 0));
-	  else
-	    return build1 (NOP_EXPR, integer_type_node, final);
 	}
+
+      field_val = (1U << feature);
+      final = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, array_elt,
+		      build_int_cstu (unsigned_type_node, field_val));
+      if (feature == (INT_TYPE_SIZE - 1))
+	return build2 (NE_EXPR, integer_type_node, final,
+		       build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, 0));
+      else
+	return build1 (NOP_EXPR, integer_type_node, final);
     }
   gcc_unreachable ();
 }
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index b1dd39e64b8..d3812fa55b0 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -21897,18 +21897,6 @@ AMD Family 19h Zen version 3.
 
 @item znver4
 AMD Family 19h Zen version 4.
-
-@item x86-64
-Baseline x86-64 microarchitecture level (as defined in x86-64 psABI).
-
-@item x86-64-v2
-x86-64-v2 microarchitecture level.
-
-@item x86-64-v3
-x86-64-v3 microarchitecture level.
-
-@item x86-64-v4
-x86-64-v4 microarchitecture level.
 @end table
 
 Here is an example:
@@ -22002,6 +21990,16 @@ VPCLMULQDQ instructions.
 AVX512VNNI instructions.
 @item avx512bitalg
 AVX512BITALG instructions.
+@item x86-64
+Baseline x86-64 microarchitecture level (as defined in x86-64 psABI).
+@item x86-64-v2
+x86-64-v2 microarchitecture level.
+@item x86-64-v3
+x86-64-v3 microarchitecture level.
+@item x86-64-v4
+x86-64-v4 microarchitecture level.
+
+
 @end table
 
 Here is an example:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c
index 3e7505a8c3a..fff643c13b0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c
@@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ quick_check ()
 
   assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("avx512vpopcntdq") >= 0);
 
+  assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >= 0);
+  assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64-v2") >= 0);
+  assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64-v3") >= 0);
+  assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64-v4") >= 0);
+
   /* Check CPU type.  */
   assert (__builtin_cpu_is ("amd") >= 0);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-11-25 12:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-25 12:10 [gcc(refs/users/marxin/heads/PR107551)] i386: fix assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >= 0) Martin Liska

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).