public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r13-5252] [PR106746] drop cselib addr lookup in debug insn mem
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 04:12:48 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119041248.CDFF03858D28@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c99493bf39a7fef9213e6f5af94b78bb15fcfdc

commit r13-5252-g3c99493bf39a7fef9213e6f5af94b78bb15fcfdc
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date:   Thu Jan 19 01:09:15 2023 -0300

    [PR106746] drop cselib addr lookup in debug insn mem
    
    The testcase used to get scheduled differently depending on the
    presence of debug insns with MEMs.  It's not clear to me why those
    MEMs affected scheduling, but the cselib pre-canonicalization of the
    MEM address is not used at all when analyzing debug insns, so the
    memory allocation and lookup are pure waste.  Somehow, avoiding that
    waste fixes the problem, or makes it go latent.
    
    
    for  gcc/ChangeLog
    
            PR debug/106746
            * sched-deps.cc (sched_analyze_2): Skip cselib address lookup
            within debug insns.
    
    for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    
            PR debug/106746
            * gcc.target/i386/pr106746.c: New.

Diff:
---
 gcc/sched-deps.cc                        | 36 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106746.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/sched-deps.cc b/gcc/sched-deps.cc
index f9371b81fb4..a9214f67432 100644
--- a/gcc/sched-deps.cc
+++ b/gcc/sched-deps.cc
@@ -2605,26 +2605,26 @@ sched_analyze_2 (class deps_desc *deps, rtx x, rtx_insn *insn)
 
     case MEM:
       {
-	/* Reading memory.  */
-	rtx_insn_list *u;
-	rtx_insn_list *pending;
-	rtx_expr_list *pending_mem;
-	rtx t = x;
-
-	if (sched_deps_info->use_cselib)
-	  {
-	    machine_mode address_mode = get_address_mode (t);
-
-	    t = shallow_copy_rtx (t);
-	    cselib_lookup_from_insn (XEXP (t, 0), address_mode, 1,
-				     GET_MODE (t), insn);
-	    XEXP (t, 0)
-	      = cselib_subst_to_values_from_insn (XEXP (t, 0), GET_MODE (t),
-						  insn);
-	  }
-
 	if (!DEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
 	  {
+	    /* Reading memory.  */
+	    rtx_insn_list *u;
+	    rtx_insn_list *pending;
+	    rtx_expr_list *pending_mem;
+	    rtx t = x;
+
+	    if (sched_deps_info->use_cselib)
+	      {
+		machine_mode address_mode = get_address_mode (t);
+
+		t = shallow_copy_rtx (t);
+		cselib_lookup_from_insn (XEXP (t, 0), address_mode, 1,
+					 GET_MODE (t), insn);
+		XEXP (t, 0)
+		  = cselib_subst_to_values_from_insn (XEXP (t, 0), GET_MODE (t),
+						      insn);
+	      }
+
 	    t = canon_rtx (t);
 	    pending = deps->pending_read_insns;
 	    pending_mem = deps->pending_read_mems;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106746.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106746.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..14f7dab71d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106746.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -fcompare-debug -Wno-psabi" } */
+
+typedef char __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64))) U;
+typedef short __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64))) V;
+typedef int __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64))) W;
+
+char c;
+U a;
+U *r;
+W foo0_v512u32_0;
+
+void
+foo (W)
+{
+  U u;
+  V v;
+  W w = __builtin_shuffle (foo0_v512u32_0, foo0_v512u32_0);
+  u =
+    __builtin_shufflevector (a, u, 3, 0, 4, 9, 9, 6, 7, 8, 5,
+			     0, 6, 1, 8, 1, 2, 8, 6,
+			     1, 8, 4, 9, 3, 8, 4, 6, 0, 9, 0, 1, 8, 2, 3, 3,
+			     0, 4, 9, 9, 6, 7, 8, 5,
+			     0, 6, 1, 8, 1, 2, 8, 6,
+			     1, 8, 4, 9, 3, 8, 4, 6, 0, 9, 0, 1, 8, 2, 3);
+  v *= c;
+  w &= c;
+  *r = (U) v + (U) w;
+}

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-01-19  4:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230119041248.CDFF03858D28@sourceware.org \
    --to=aoliva@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).