public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r13-5374] Fortran: ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec [PR108528]
@ 2023-01-25 19:47 Harald Anlauf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Harald Anlauf @ 2023-01-25 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fb9da3d38513d320bfea72050f7a59688595e0b

commit r13-5374-g9fb9da3d38513d320bfea72050f7a59688595e0b
Author: Steve Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
Date:   Wed Jan 25 20:38:43 2023 +0100

    Fortran: ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec [PR108528]
    
    gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
    
            PR fortran/108528
            * array.cc (compare_bounds): Return false instead of generating an
            internal error on an invalid argument type.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            PR fortran/108528
            * gfortran.dg/pr108528.f90: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/fortran/array.cc                   | 4 ++--
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108528.f90 | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.cc b/gcc/fortran/array.cc
index e8a2c32a627..be5eb8b6a0f 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/array.cc
@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ gfc_copy_array_spec (gfc_array_spec *src)
 
 
 /* Returns nonzero if the two expressions are equal.
-   We should not need to support more than constant values, as that’s what is
+   We should not need to support more than constant values, as that's what is
    allowed in derived type component array spec.  However, we may create types
    with non-constant array spec for dummy variable class container types, for
    which the _data component holds the array spec of the variable declaration.
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ compare_bounds (gfc_expr *bound1, gfc_expr *bound2)
   if (bound1 == NULL || bound2 == NULL
       || bound1->ts.type != BT_INTEGER
       || bound2->ts.type != BT_INTEGER)
-    gfc_internal_error ("gfc_compare_array_spec(): Array spec clobbered");
+    return false;
 
   /* What qualifies as identical bounds?  We could probably just check that the
      expressions are exact clones.  We avoid rewriting a specific comparison
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108528.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108528.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7a353cb7eab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr108528.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR fortran/108528 -
+! Contributed by G.Steinmetz
+
+function f()         ! { dg-error "mismatched array specifications" }
+  integer :: f((2.)) ! { dg-error "must be of INTEGER type" }
+  integer :: g((2))
+entry g()
+end

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-01-25 19:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-25 19:47 [gcc r13-5374] Fortran: ICE in gfc_compare_array_spec [PR108528] Harald Anlauf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).