public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r11-10685] i386: Fix up ix86_abi handling [PR106875]
@ 2023-05-02 20:12 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-05-02 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:511b878b6a808c3d46dccf806223a851e63ad562

commit r11-10685-g511b878b6a808c3d46dccf806223a851e63ad562
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 28 10:13:43 2022 +0100

    i386: Fix up ix86_abi handling [PR106875]
    
    The following testcase fails since my changes to make also
    opts_set saved/restored upon function target/optimization changes
    (before it has been acting as "has this option be ever explicit
    anywhere?").
    
    The problem is that for ix86_abi we depend on the opts_set
    value for it in ix86_option_override_internal:
      SET_OPTION_IF_UNSET (opts, opts_set, ix86_abi, DEFAULT_ABI);
    but as it is a TargetSave, the backend code is required to
    save/restore it manually (it does that) and since gcc 11 also
    to save/restore the opts_set bit for it (which isn't done).
    We don't do that for various other TargetSave which
    ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} saves/restores, but as long
    as we never test opts_set for it, it doesn't really matter.
    One possible fix would be to introduce some new TargetSave into
    which ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} would save/restore a bitmask
    of the opts_set bits.  The following patch uses an easier fix, by
    making it a TargetVariable instead the saving/restoring is handled
    by the generated code.
    The differences in options.h are just slight movements on where
    *ix86_abi stuff appears in it, ditto for options.cc, the real
    differences are just in options-save.cc, where cl_target_option_save
    gets:
    +  ptr->x_ix86_abi = opts->x_ix86_abi;
    ...
    +  if (opts_set->x_ix86_abi) mask |= HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 3;
    (plus adjustments of following TargetVariables mask related stuff),
    cl_target_option_restore gets:
    +  opts->x_ix86_abi = ptr->x_ix86_abi;
    ...
    +  opts_set->x_ix86_abi = static_cast<enum calling_abi>((mask & 1) != 0);
    +  mask >>= 1;
    plus the movements in other functions too.  So, by it being a
    TargetVariable, the only thing that changed is that we don't need to
    handle it manually in ix86_function_specific_{save,restore} because it
    is handled automatically including the opts_set stuff.
    
    2022-11-28  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR target/106875
            * config/i386/i386.opt (x_ix86_abi): Remove TargetSave.
            (ix86_abi): Replace it with TargetVariable.
            * config/i386/i386-options.c (ix86_function_specific_save,
            ix86_function_specific_restore): Don't save and restore x_ix86_abi.
    
            * g++.target/i386/pr106875.C: New test.
    
    (cherry picked from commit ee629d242d9f93a38e49bed904bb334bbe15dde1)

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c           |  2 --
 gcc/config/i386/i386.opt                 |  4 ++--
 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr106875.C | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c
index 19632b5fd6b..b74df4d549e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c
@@ -656,7 +656,6 @@ ix86_function_specific_save (struct cl_target_option *ptr,
   ptr->x_recip_mask_explicit = opts->x_recip_mask_explicit;
   ptr->x_ix86_arch_string = opts->x_ix86_arch_string;
   ptr->x_ix86_tune_string = opts->x_ix86_tune_string;
-  ptr->x_ix86_abi = opts->x_ix86_abi;
   ptr->x_ix86_asm_dialect = opts->x_ix86_asm_dialect;
   ptr->x_ix86_branch_cost = opts->x_ix86_branch_cost;
   ptr->x_ix86_dump_tunes = opts->x_ix86_dump_tunes;
@@ -787,7 +786,6 @@ ix86_function_specific_restore (struct gcc_options *opts,
   opts->x_recip_mask_explicit = ptr->x_recip_mask_explicit;
   opts->x_ix86_arch_string = ptr->x_ix86_arch_string;
   opts->x_ix86_tune_string = ptr->x_ix86_tune_string;
-  opts->x_ix86_abi = ptr->x_ix86_abi;
   opts->x_ix86_asm_dialect = ptr->x_ix86_asm_dialect;
   opts->x_ix86_branch_cost = ptr->x_ix86_branch_cost;
   opts->x_ix86_dump_tunes = ptr->x_ix86_dump_tunes;
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt b/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt
index f62b0ebd3b4..a40f3c4d3ea 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.opt
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ TargetVariable
 enum cmodel ix86_cmodel = CM_32
 
 ;; -mabi=
-TargetSave
-enum calling_abi x_ix86_abi
+TargetVariable
+enum calling_abi ix86_abi = SYSV_ABI
 
 ;; -masm=
 TargetSave
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr106875.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr106875.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1b3f4c8b25c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr106875.C
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// PR target/106875
+// { dg-do compile { target { c++11 && lp64 } } }
+// { dg-options "-O0 -mabi=ms -fabi-version=3 -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues" }
+
+#pragma GCC target "avx"
+template <typename> struct A {};
+#pragma GCC push_options
+#pragma GCC target "avx,avx2,bmi,bmi2,fma,f16c"
+template <typename T> using B = A<T>;
+template <typename> struct C;
+template <> struct C<float> {
+  __attribute__((always_inline)) float operator()(long) { return .0f; }
+};
+long d;
+template <typename T> void e(B<T>) {
+  T{C<T>()(d)};
+}
+template <typename T, typename FromT> void f(T d, FromT) {
+  e(d);
+}
+int g;
+void h() {
+  A<float> i;
+  f(i, g);
+}
+#pragma GCC pop_options

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-05-02 20:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-02 20:12 [gcc r11-10685] i386: Fix up ix86_abi handling [PR106875] Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).