public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-4110] c++: unifying identical tmpls from current inst [PR108347]
@ 2023-09-18 18:41 Patrick Palka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2023-09-18 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6ac1fc64c3caed19da65c2e6b12f8ddaf551231

commit r14-4110-ga6ac1fc64c3caed19da65c2e6b12f8ddaf551231
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 18 14:41:07 2023 -0400

    c++: unifying identical tmpls from current inst [PR108347]
    
    Here more_specialized_partial_spec wrongly considers the two partial
    specializations to be unordered ultimately because unify for identical
    parm=arg=A<T>::C returns failure due to C being dependent.
    
    This patch fixes this by relaxing unify's early-exit identity test to
    also accept dependent decls; we can't deduce anything further from them
    anyway.  In passing this patch removes the CONST_DECL case of unify:
    we should never see the CONST_DECL version of a template parameter here,
    and for other CONST_DECLs (such as enumerators) it seems we can rely on
    them to already have been folded to their DECL_INITIAL.
    
            PR c++/108347
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * pt.cc (unify): Return unify_success for identical dependent
            DECL_P 'arg' and 'parm'.
            <case CONST_DECL>: Remove handling.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/template/ttp41.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                          | 10 ++++------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/ttp41.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index a40b8953e62..31ff80ea6e7 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -24559,7 +24559,8 @@ unify (tree tparms, tree targs, tree parm, tree arg, int strict,
      even if ARG == PARM, since we won't record unifications for the
      template parameters.  We might need them if we're trying to
      figure out which of two things is more specialized.  */
-  if (arg == parm && !uses_template_parms (parm))
+  if (arg == parm
+      && (DECL_P (parm) || !uses_template_parms (parm)))
     return unify_success (explain_p);
 
   /* Handle init lists early, so the rest of the function can assume
@@ -25278,11 +25279,8 @@ unify (tree tparms, tree targs, tree parm, tree arg, int strict,
 		    strict, explain_p);
 
     case CONST_DECL:
-      if (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (parm))
-	return unify (tparms, targs, DECL_INITIAL (parm), arg, strict, explain_p);
-      if (arg != scalar_constant_value (parm))
-	return unify_template_argument_mismatch (explain_p, parm, arg);
-      return unify_success (explain_p);
+      /* CONST_DECL should already have been folded to its DECL_INITIAL.  */
+      gcc_unreachable ();
 
     case FIELD_DECL:
     case TEMPLATE_DECL:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/ttp41.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/ttp41.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c81e5dd2405
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/ttp41.C
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/108347
+
+template<class T>
+struct A {
+  template<class U> struct C { };
+
+  template<template<class> class TT, class U>
+  struct B;
+
+  template<class U>
+  struct B<C, U*>;
+
+  template<class U>
+  struct B<C, const U*> { };
+};
+
+A<int>::B<A<int>::C, const int*> b;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-09-18 18:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-18 18:41 [gcc r14-4110] c++: unifying identical tmpls from current inst [PR108347] Patrick Palka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).