public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-8419] RISC-V: Add LCM delete block predecessors dump information
@ 2024-01-25 9:20 Pan Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pan Li @ 2024-01-25 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6c2a1d79eb333a00124bf67820a7f405d0d8641
commit r14-8419-gc6c2a1d79eb333a00124bf67820a7f405d0d8641
Author: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Date: Thu Jan 25 16:59:42 2024 +0800
RISC-V: Add LCM delete block predecessors dump information
While looking into PR113469, I notice the LCM delete a vsetvl incorrectly.
This patch add dump information of all predecessors for LCM delete vsetvl block
for better debugging.
Tested no regression.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (get_all_predecessors): New function.
(pre_vsetvl::pre_global_vsetvl_info): Add LCM delete block all
predecessors dump information.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
index 72c5a127d9e..da258b964fc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
@@ -654,6 +654,31 @@ invalid_opt_bb_p (basic_block cfg_bb)
return false;
}
+/* Get all predecessors of BB. */
+static hash_set<basic_block>
+get_all_predecessors (basic_block bb)
+{
+ hash_set<basic_block> blocks;
+ auto_vec<basic_block> work_list;
+ hash_set<basic_block> visited_list;
+ work_list.safe_push (bb);
+
+ while (!work_list.is_empty ())
+ {
+ basic_block new_bb = work_list.pop ();
+ visited_list.add (new_bb);
+ edge e;
+ edge_iterator ei;
+ FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, new_bb->preds)
+ {
+ if (!visited_list.contains (e->src))
+ work_list.safe_push (e->src);
+ blocks.add (e->src);
+ }
+ }
+ return blocks;
+}
+
/* This flags indicates the minimum demand of the vl and vtype values by the
RVV instruction. For example, DEMAND_RATIO_P indicates that this RVV
instruction only needs the SEW/LMUL ratio to remain the same, and does not
@@ -3142,6 +3167,23 @@ pre_vsetvl::pre_global_vsetvl_info ()
const vsetvl_block_info &block_info = get_block_info (info.get_bb ());
gcc_assert (block_info.get_entry_info () == info);
info.set_delete ();
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file,
+ "\nLCM deleting vsetvl of block %d, it has predecessors: \n",
+ bb->index ());
+ hash_set<basic_block> all_preds
+ = get_all_predecessors (bb->cfg_bb ());
+ int i = 0;
+ for (const auto pred : all_preds)
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, "%d ", pred->index);
+ i++;
+ if (i % 32 == 0)
+ fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+ }
+ fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+ }
}
/* Remove vsetvl infos if all precessors are available to the block. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-01-25 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-25 9:20 [gcc r14-8419] RISC-V: Add LCM delete block predecessors dump information Pan Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).