public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-8419] RISC-V: Add LCM delete block predecessors dump information
@ 2024-01-25  9:20 Pan Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pan Li @ 2024-01-25  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6c2a1d79eb333a00124bf67820a7f405d0d8641

commit r14-8419-gc6c2a1d79eb333a00124bf67820a7f405d0d8641
Author: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Date:   Thu Jan 25 16:59:42 2024 +0800

    RISC-V: Add LCM delete block predecessors dump information
    
    While looking into PR113469, I notice the LCM delete a vsetvl incorrectly.
    
    This patch add dump information of all predecessors for LCM delete vsetvl block
    for better debugging.
    
    Tested no regression.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (get_all_predecessors): New function.
            (pre_vsetvl::pre_global_vsetvl_info): Add LCM delete block all
            predecessors dump information.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
index 72c5a127d9e..da258b964fc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
@@ -654,6 +654,31 @@ invalid_opt_bb_p (basic_block cfg_bb)
   return false;
 }
 
+/* Get all predecessors of BB.  */
+static hash_set<basic_block>
+get_all_predecessors (basic_block bb)
+{
+  hash_set<basic_block> blocks;
+  auto_vec<basic_block> work_list;
+  hash_set<basic_block> visited_list;
+  work_list.safe_push (bb);
+
+  while (!work_list.is_empty ())
+    {
+      basic_block new_bb = work_list.pop ();
+      visited_list.add (new_bb);
+      edge e;
+      edge_iterator ei;
+      FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, new_bb->preds)
+	{
+	  if (!visited_list.contains (e->src))
+	    work_list.safe_push (e->src);
+	  blocks.add (e->src);
+	}
+    }
+  return blocks;
+}
+
 /* This flags indicates the minimum demand of the vl and vtype values by the
    RVV instruction. For example, DEMAND_RATIO_P indicates that this RVV
    instruction only needs the SEW/LMUL ratio to remain the same, and does not
@@ -3142,6 +3167,23 @@ pre_vsetvl::pre_global_vsetvl_info ()
       const vsetvl_block_info &block_info = get_block_info (info.get_bb ());
       gcc_assert (block_info.get_entry_info () == info);
       info.set_delete ();
+      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+	{
+	  fprintf (dump_file,
+		   "\nLCM deleting vsetvl of block %d, it has predecessors: \n",
+		   bb->index ());
+	  hash_set<basic_block> all_preds
+	    = get_all_predecessors (bb->cfg_bb ());
+	  int i = 0;
+	  for (const auto pred : all_preds)
+	    {
+	      fprintf (dump_file, "%d ", pred->index);
+	      i++;
+	      if (i % 32 == 0)
+		fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+	    }
+	  fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
+	}
     }
 
   /* Remove vsetvl infos if all precessors are available to the block.  */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-01-25  9:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-25  9:20 [gcc r14-8419] RISC-V: Add LCM delete block predecessors dump information Pan Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).