[gcc r14-8836] testsuite: Don't xfail gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c

[gcc r14-8836] testsuite: Don't xfail gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c

[Rainer Orth]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e308d5f71a91225946c199e69708adc92404975

commit r14-8836-g6e308d5f71a91225946c199e69708adc92404975
Author: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Date:   Wed Feb 7 10:03:31 2024 +0100

    testsuite: Don't xfail gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c
    
    gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c has been XPASSing on Solaris (both SPARC
    and x86, 32 and 64-bit) with the native assembler since 20210429.
    According to gcc-testresults postings, the same is true on AIX.
    
    XPASS: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c scan-assembler-not \\\\(DIE \\\\(0x([0-9a-f]*)\\\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block\\\\)[^#/!@;\\\\|]*[#/!@;\\\\|]+ +DW_AT.*DW_TAG_lexical_block\\\\)[^#/!@;\\\\|x]*x\\\\1[^#/!@;\\\\|]*[#/!@;\\\\|] +DW_AT_abstract_origin
    
    This is obviously due to
    
    commit 16683cefc636636ba6fed23fe0de89ed19bc7876
    Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
    Date:   Wed Apr 28 14:07:41 2021 -0300
    
        fix asm-not pattern in dwarf2/inline5.c
    
    This patch thus removes the xfail.
    
    Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (as and gas), sparc-sun-solaris2.11 (as
    and gas), and i686-pc-linux-gnu.
    
    2024-02-06  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
    
            gcc/testsuite:
            * gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c: Don't xfail scan-assembler-not on
            { aix || solaris2 } && !gas.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c
index 3b50e9f26173..7dd1148c53ae 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 /* We do not know which is output first so look for both invalid abstract
    origins on the lexical blocks (knowing that the abstract instance has
    no attribute following the DW_TAG_lexical_block.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\\(DIE \\(0x(\[0-9a-f\]*)\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)\[^#/!@;\\|\]*\[#/!@;\\|\]+ +DW_AT.*DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)\[^#/!@;\\|x\]*x\\1\[^#/!@;\\|\]*\[#/!@;\\|\] +DW_AT_abstract_origin" { xfail { { *-*-aix* || *-*-solaris2.* } && { ! gas } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\\(DIE \\(0x(\[0-9a-f\]*)\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)\[^#/!@;\\|\]*\[#/!@;\\|\]+ +DW_AT.*DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)\[^#/!@;\\|x\]*x\\1\[^#/!@;\\|\]*\[#/!@;\\|\] +DW_AT_abstract_origin" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)\[^#/!@;\\|x\]*x(\[0-9a-f\]*)\[^#/!@;\\|\]*\[#/!@;\\|\]+ +DW_AT_abstract_origin.*\\(DIE \\(0x\\1\\) DW_TAG_lexical_block\\)\[^#/!@;\\|\]*\[#/!@;\\|\]+ +DW_AT" } } */
 
 int foo (int i)