public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-8949] libgcc: Fix UB in FP_FROM_BITINT
@ 2024-02-13  9:33 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2024-02-13  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ca373b7e8adf9cc0c17aecab5e1cc6c76a92f4c

commit r14-8949-g2ca373b7e8adf9cc0c17aecab5e1cc6c76a92f4c
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 13 10:33:08 2024 +0100

    libgcc: Fix UB in FP_FROM_BITINT
    
    As I wrote earlier, I was seeing
    FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/bitint-24.c   -O0  execution test
    FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/bitint-24.c   -O2  execution test
    with the ia32 _BitInt enablement patch on i686-linux.  I thought
    floatbitintxf.c was miscompiled with -O2 -march=i686 -mtune=generic, but it
    turned out to be UB in it.
    
    If a signed _BitInt to be converted to binary floating point has
    (after sign extension from possible partial limb to full limb) one or
    more most significant limbs equal to all ones and then in the limb below
    (the most significant non-~(UBILtype)0 limb) has the most significant limb
    cleared, like for 32-bit limbs
    0x81582c05U, 0x0a8b01e4U, 0xc1b8b18fU, 0x2aac2a08U, -1U, -1U
    then bitint_reduce_prec can't reduce it to that 0x2aac2a08U limb, so
    msb is all ones and precision is negative (so it reduced precision from
    161 to 192 bits down to 160 bits, in theory could go as low as 129 bits
    but that wouldn't change anything on the following behavior).
    But still iprec is negative, -160 here.
    For that case (i.e. where we are dealing with an negative input), the
    code was using 65 - __builtin_clzll (~msb) to compute how many relevant
    bits we have from the msb.  Unfortunately that invokes UB for msb all ones.
    The right number of relevant bits in that case is 1 though (like for
    -2 it is 2 and -4 or -3 3 as already computed) - all we care about from that
    is that the most significant bit is set (i.e. the number is negative) and
    the bits below that should be supplied from the limbs below.
    
    So, the following patch fixes it by special casing it not to invoke UB.
    
    For msb 0 we already have a special case from before (but that is also
    different because msb 0 implies the whole number is 0 given the way
    bitint_reduce_prec works - even if we have limbs like ..., 0x80000000U, 0U
    the reduction can skip the most significant limb and msb then would be
    the one below it), so if iprec > 0, we already don't call __builtin_clzll
    on 0.
    
    2024-02-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            * soft-fp/bitint.h (FP_FROM_BITINT): If iprec < 0 and msb is all ones,
            just set n to 1 instead of using __builtin_clzll (~msb).

Diff:
---
 libgcc/soft-fp/bitint.h | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libgcc/soft-fp/bitint.h b/libgcc/soft-fp/bitint.h
index cb4d822cb49b..07a7bcbb0b99 100644
--- a/libgcc/soft-fp/bitint.h
+++ b/libgcc/soft-fp/bitint.h
@@ -276,7 +276,11 @@ bitint_negate (UBILtype *d, const UBILtype *s, SItype n)
 	}								\
       if (iprec < 0)							\
 	{								\
-	  n = sizeof (0ULL) * __CHAR_BIT__ + 1 - __builtin_clzll (~msb);\
+	  if (msb == (UBILtype) -1)					\
+	    n = 1;							\
+	  else								\
+	    n = (sizeof (0ULL) * __CHAR_BIT__ + 1			\
+		 - __builtin_clzll (~msb));				\
 	  if (BIL_TYPE_SIZE > DI##_BITS && n > DI##_BITS)		\
 	    {								\
 	      iv = msb >> (n - DI##_BITS);				\

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-02-13  9:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-13  9:33 [gcc r14-8949] libgcc: Fix UB in FP_FROM_BITINT Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).